Search for: "Florida v. United States" Results 5601 - 5620 of 6,537
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Feb 2010, 11:39 pm by Fernando M. Pinguelo
Lexington Insurance, the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Orlando Division, granted a motion for Rule 37 Discovery Sanctions brought by defendant Lexington Insurance Co. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 5:43 pm by Mark Terry
TMEP §1015 states that once issued, the United States registration issuing from a §44 application exists independent of the underlying foreign registration and is subject to all provisions of the Trademark Act that apply to all other registrations, such as affidavits of use, renewals, amendments under 15 U.S.C. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 3:37 pm by Kim
United States Supreme Court ruling released today (February 24) provides an exception to the 1981 Edwards v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 6:52 am by Matt Sundquist
Humanitarian Law Project and United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 12:52 pm
The United States Supreme Court released its opinion today in Florida v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 12:05 pm by Jimmy Verner
 State Bar of Texas Section Report - Family Law - Summer 2009 by Jimmy L. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 6:33 am by Adam Chandler
United Press International offers an in-depth preview of Holder v. [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 7:24 am by Tom
Florida, No. 08-7412, and Sullivan v. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 6:12 pm
  While not cited in the opinion, Florida's Second District Court of Appeal previously reached the same result in Embry v. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 2:55 am
: Hewlett-Packard Co. v Acceleron, LLC (Florida Patent Lawyer Blog) (PatLit) District Court E D Texas: Device component may ‘receive’ data from itself: Datatreasury Corporation v. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 2:55 am
: Hewlett-Packard Co. v Acceleron, LLC (Florida Patent Lawyer Blog) (PatLit) District Court E D Texas: Device component may ‘receive’ data from itself: Datatreasury Corporation v. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 9:35 am by Joshua Glazov
  The United States Department of Housing and Urban Development ("HUD") required the project to comply with accessibility guidelines established under the Fair Housing Act. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 5:00 am by Erin Miller
United States (08-1301) – petitioner’s reply brief United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 8:41 am by Matt Bodie
Nixon, United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee. [read post]