Search for: "GROUP v. STATE" Results 5601 - 5620 of 37,549
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Nov 2021, 3:29 am by INFORRM
This argument was founded on the Court of Appeal’s judgment in the case of Gulati v MGN, which concerned systematic phone hacking by journalists from the Mirror Group. [read post]
The United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments Monday in Federal Bureau of Investigation v. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 11:44 am by Aziz Huq, Tom Ginsburg, David Landau
  Second, some systems use forward-looking group disqualification. [read post]
However, the case has emboldened groups of businesses, religious groups, and at least half the states to mount a serious challenge to OSHA’s authority to issue such a rule, arguing that a mandate like this one is a legislative act that only can be enacted by Congress. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 8:26 am
" (Humeyra Pamuk and Simon Lewis, "Biden's democracy summit: Problematic invite list casts shadow on impact," Reuters (7 November 2021) ("'If the summit is to be anything more than just another meeting, each attendee, including the United States, will need to follow through on meaningful commitments on democracy and rights issues in the year ahead,"'said Annie Boyajian, vice president for policy and advocacy at Freedom House, a non-profit… [read post]
The Federal Circuit also reiterated that the TTAB need not find that the German company owned U.S. trademark rights to bring a cancellation action (Piano Factory Group, Inc. v. [read post]
The Federal Circuit also reiterated that the TTAB need not find that the German company owned U.S. trademark rights to bring a cancellation action (Piano Factory Group, Inc. v. [read post]
The Federal Circuit also reiterated that the TTAB need not find that the German company owned U.S. trademark rights to bring a cancellation action (Piano Factory Group, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2021, 5:01 pm by Ronald Mann
ShareIt is fair to expect that the argument on Monday in Unicolors v. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 8:35 am by Eugene Volokh
Such nondiscrimination conditions attached to government-provided benefits are constitutional even as to purely ideological groups that seek, for instance, the sorts of benefits that universities routinely provide to all student groups, see Christian Legal Society v. [read post]