Search for: "In Re: Mark M." Results 5601 - 5620 of 7,669
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Aug 2010, 5:31 am by Mandelman
”  No, Benjamin… we think YOU’RE A DOUBLE DIP. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 10:49 pm by Kelly
(Docket Report) District Court Utah: Defendant’s inadequate data retention policies, loss of source code for patented software did not warrant terminating sanctions for spoliation: Phillip M. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 2:08 pm by Bexis
When the Levine, Riegel, and Kent cases were briefed in the United States Supreme Court, we provided our readers with “users’ guides”/”guided tours” that summarized the defense side arguments and pointed out whatever we thought was interesting.Today we’re continuing that tradition with the Bruesewitz (sooner or later we’ll memorize how to spell that) v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 2:50 am by SHG
  Nonetheless, I'm giving it another try. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 9:56 pm
Monday's post on the subject has sparked off quite a bit of debate, so I'm going to write an editorial for the Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice (JIPLP) on this very point. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 10:23 am by Mandelman
They turned to Bruce Marks’ traveling tent show of an non-profit organization, NACA, for help. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 8:32 am by David Lat
The sale price: a cool $1.725 million (marked down from an original $1.99 million). [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 7:00 am by Kara OBrien
  On this ground, B&M asks the court to re-write the contract so as to remove the $3.5 million payment… B&M is a sophisticated commercial party that was represented by lawyers. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 6:24 am
So how could the mark “NEW YORK NEW YORK” have been distinctive at the time of the Domain Name was registered if the only basis for NY-NY’s own claim for registration on the Principal Register is NY-NY’s claim of acquire distinctiveness which it could not have achieved until it began using the mark in commerce in January 1997? [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am by Steven M. Taber
Vol. 2, No. 22, August 2, 2010 The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 3:41 am by SHG
One additional aspect of Mark's quote that bears some straightening out is the reference to real criminal defense lawyers, which John attributed to a twit of mine and then conflated with Bennett's argument, as if we're a conspiracy against him. [read post]
31 Jul 2010, 2:35 am
In addition to these conditions in the Agreement, Maruti also replaced the ‘M’ on its products with ‘S’. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 7:12 am by law shucks
Related posts:General Corporate – Wachtell is Overrated Weil Crushes Vault Bankruptcy Rankings M&A Rankings Out – Wachtell #1 (and Not #1) [read post]