Search for: "In Re CAL"
Results 5601 - 5620
of 5,826
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2016, 10:39 am
Bollaert, 2016 WL 3536550 (Cal. [read post]
26 Sep 2024, 9:51 am
September 26, 2024 | By: Daniel Davis & Alex Butterman In Jack Daniel’s v. [read post]
19 Mar 2017, 5:05 pm
Northern Ireland In the case of Re Doran (No.2) [2017] NIQB 24 the High Court has found that the decision of the Department for the Economy to publish the names of “natural persons” in receipt of Renewal Heat Incentive Scheme funding was in breach of the Data Protection Act 1998. [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 1:31 pm
Cal.) [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 6:58 am
Google et al, Cal. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 7:12 am
Tenn. 2022) and Cisco (N.D Cal. 2022), show just how difficult it is to plead a meritorious derivative Section 14(a) claim. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
A fascinating legal soap opera is now underway following a trial just completed in California. [read post]
21 May 2009, 2:14 pm
California Rules of Court Rule 3.769(a), 3.770(a); In re Microsoft I-V Cases(2006) 135 Cal.App.4th 706, 723. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 11:08 pm
Proposition 8 In In re Marriage Cases (2008) 43 Cal.4th 757 the Californian Supreme Court had decided that laws differentiating between the treatment of opposite-sex and same-sex couples were subject to ‘strict scrutiny’, i.e. a particularly rigorous equality/anti-discrimination analysis. [read post]
30 Apr 2022, 11:53 am
Wait a sec: How can an employer be required to keep employees whose views it disagrees with, or who are just more trouble than they're worth? [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 4:31 pm
Cal. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 6:29 am
” 224 Cal. [read post]
21 Feb 2025, 10:44 am
Cal. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 1:46 am
Rather that look through the DOL regulations closely to try to devise a test that could be harmonized with the regulations as a whole, the two-justice majority just re-announced the earlier standard that, to meet the exemption, the employee must primarily perform work "at the level of policy or general operations," a phrase that appears nowhere within the governing DOL regulations. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 7:08 am
Cal. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 8:18 am
Adam Kovacevich has defined the “Prager Effect” as “suing Big Tech to make your MAGA censorship allegation, resulting in Courts significantly strengthening platforms’ legal rights to moderate. [read post]
13 May 2010, 1:15 pm
Union Pacific Railroad Co., 2010 WL 298387 (Cal. [read post]
1 Jan 2010, 2:12 pm
Cal. 1908), Latourette v. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 8:30 am
They confirm that I am building an audience; they tell me what my readers are interested in; and, the assure me that people stay to read once they find me, even when they're just downloading an image.They are the candles on my FIRST LEXBLOG BIRTHDAY cake. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 4:19 am
Thus we’re left with the question of if the casino “knows or by the exercise of reasonable care would discover the condition” We can reword that as a question: would a casino exercising reasonable care discover an unattended child in a car before the child was hurt? [read post]
