Search for: "People v High" Results 5601 - 5620 of 15,046
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Sep 2023, 10:39 am by Mark Tushnet
My guess is that in discussions about whether to create a plural executive you’d find the same assumption at work, with people saying that distinctions among those people would have to be made expressly in the Constitution or adopted by the executives themselves. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 1:30 am by Jani Ihalainen
Rude language can be a sore point of contention for many people. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 8:58 am by Stephen Griffin
 Based on the commentary so far, I’m not convinced anyone has a firm grasp on the consequences that would follow should the Supreme Court use the Dobbs case to overrule Roe v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 6:27 pm by Andrew Koppelman
”  That of course returns us to the world of Hopkins v. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 5:55 am by David Oscar Markus
That he wants O’Connor to vote to strike down Roe v. [read post]
12 Jan 2019, 4:00 pm
The state Supreme Court will hear oral arguments Jan. 18 in the case of State v. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 7:57 am by Alex Vitrak
Yesterday, the ACLU joined one billion people from around the world in taking a stand against violence through our participation in V-Day, a global activist movement to end violence against women and girls. [read post]
9 Apr 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
  Given the food, the library's beauty, and the fact that the mantra in my heaven is that reasonable people can disagree, these discussions are usually very cheerful. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 1:13 pm by Giancarlo Frosio
Recently, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) decided in Svensson et al v Retriever Sverige that links to authorized works freely available online do not infringe the E.U. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 7:00 am
On Thursday, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals will hear oral argument in Wikimedia v. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 2:06 am by Jani
People can be inconsiderate, and at times outright indifferent, to potential liability issues in using other peoples' or organizations' free WiFi, which begs the question: can a third-party be liable for possible infringement on their wireless network? [read post]