Search for: "STEVEN YORK"
Results 5601 - 5620
of 6,534
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2009, 10:30 am
As the New York Times reported, the court ruled 6-3 that there is no implied preemption in federal law that would stop state juries from hearing drug injury lawsuits. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 10:02 am
New York State Assemblyman Tom O’Mara has sponsored “Steven’s Law,” an amendment to NY’s Vehicle and Traffic law, inspired by a tragic local accident case that I handled. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 9:19 am
To contact the reporters on this story: David Glovin in New York federal court at dglovin@bloomberg.net; David Voreacos in New York federal court at dvoreacos@bloomberg.net; Patricia Hurtado in New York federal court at pathurtado@bloomberg.net. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 1:00 am
[Thanks to Steven H. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 1:10 pm
That's the title of Adam Liptak's report in today's New York Times. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 12:00 pm
Bisignano, Chief Administrative Officer, JPMorgan Chase & Co., and Member of PENCIL's Board of Directors PENCIL Corporate Partner AwardIBMAccepted by Steven A. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 7:06 am
The cases were New York City v. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 6:36 am
The report is allegedly critical of the actions of three lawyers -- John Yoo, Jay Bybee, and Steven Bradbury. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 7:34 am
Here's the summary of the podcast, which is part of Doug's ongoing IP Colloquium series: Joel Tenenbaum looks a lot like every other defendant who has been accused by the music industry of illegally sharing copyrighted work online, but with one key difference: his defense attorney is Harvard Law School Professor Charlie Nesson, and Nesson is out to turn his case into a public referendum not only on the music industry's efforts to enforce copyright through… [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 12:36 pm
” Justice Stevens was joined by Justices Anthony M. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 6:49 am
In writing for the majority, Justice John Paul Stevens said it was possible for Wyeth to comply with both federal and state laws in this matter. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 10:39 pm
Guests include Professor Nesson himself; Steven Marks, General Counsel for the Recording Industry Association of America; and three of the leading academic experts on punitive damages: New York University Professor Catherine Sharkey, Florida State Professor Dan Markel, and George Washington University Professor Thomas Colby. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 1:57 pm
Guests include Professor Nesson himself; Steven Marks, General Counsel for the Recording Industry Association of America; and three of the leading academic experts on punitive damages: New York University Professor Catherine Sharkey, Florida State Professor Dan Markel, and George Washington University Professor Thomas Colby. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 12:12 pm
: The New York Times DealBook: Harvard, Private Equity and the Education Bubble, by Steven M. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 11:06 am
The New York Times Article may be read here: New York Times The Washington Post Article may be read here: Washington Post The Supreme Court opinion in Wyeth v. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 10:24 pm
In an editorial, The New York Times said: “This case offers the nation’s top court the opportunity to make clear that judges who receive outsize campaign contributions have a duty to recuse themselves. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 10:24 pm
In an editorial, The New York Times said: “This case offers the nation’s top court the opportunity to make clear that judges who receive outsize campaign contributions have a duty to recuse themselves. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 11:36 am
As you may recall, the controversy over whether there are increased heart risks caused by Avandia began with a 2007 study by Steven E. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 10:25 am
Frey of New York. in opposing to a new constitutional rule on recusal – that “the reputation of the judicial system…is not the function of the Due Process Clause to address. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 12:01 am
As Justice Stevens said, "I think it appropriate to emphasize the distinction between constitutionality and wise policy,The Constitution does not prohibit legislatures from enacting stupid laws. [read post]
