Search for: "STEVENS v. THE STATE" Results 5601 - 5620 of 7,829
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2010, 3:24 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Over on the NYT’s “Room for Debate” blog, Steven Camarota of the Center for Immigration Studies argues the law “is designed to mirror federal immigration law” and thereby avoids any preemption problem. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 2:27 pm by Bill Araiza
  If the Second Amendment is incorporated against the states does that mean that Alaskans have fewer Second Amendment rights because the "right [that] was understood at the time" that Alaska was admitted was presumably the understanding in United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 1:59 pm by Deepak Gupta
  Yesterday, the Court heard oral argument in Rent-a-Center v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 8:58 am
On April 20, 2010, the Supreme Court announced its decision in United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 6:35 am by Jay Willis
  At The New York Times, Adam Liptak reports that the grant – which came less than a week after the Court’s decision in another free-speech case, United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm by Tom Goldstein
  The Supreme Court subsequently reversed in a six-to-three ruling, with the majority opinion for five Justices written by Justice Stevens. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 9:59 am by Eugene Volokh
Naturally, some people might try to defend this on the grounds that prosecutors won’t apply the statute as broadly as it’s written, but will instead focus just on “extreme” cyberbullying; but I think Chief Justice Roberts’ majority opinion in last week’s United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 9:13 pm by Adam Wagner
The UK Supreme Court Blog has posted on United States v Stevens, a US Supreme Court decision on animal cruelty videos, involving “freedom of expression in the extreme”. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 5:56 pm by INFORRM
The decision handed down last week by the United States Supreme Court in United States v Stevens shows the radically different approach taken in the United States in relation questions of “extreme” and “offensive” freedom of expression. [read post]