Search for: "SUITS v. STATE"
Results 5601 - 5620
of 32,593
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Dec 2013, 12:53 pm
Jack Tully v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 3:42 am
Ice overruled State v. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 7:42 am
The suit was dismissed. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 5:02 am
The post JORDAN v. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 11:06 am
Pauley denied (in large part) defendants’ motion in Ganek v. [read post]
18 Feb 2008, 11:00 am
That was the apparent question in CALPERS v. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 5:54 am
In Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 7:57 am
For the agreement:https://www.eff.org/document/lagleva-v-doyle-settlment-agreement For more on this case:https://www.eff.org/cases/lagleva-v-marin Contact: press@aclunc.org [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 8:20 am
Although the court went on to note that it couldn’t formally rule on the Commerce Clause issue because the defendant had been dismissed on other grounds, several commentators (here and here) have suggested that RCRA citizen suits may be subject to constitutional challenge where the contamination does not cross state lines. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 9:20 am
While we know from Reno v. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 6:19 am
Rosenbach v. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 12:05 pm
However, the Court declined to issue a nationwide injunction and instead focused on the three states who brought the suit. [read post]
3 Mar 2007, 4:19 pm
In this case, Shaw's immunity to suit hinged on the interpretation of its contracts with the government. [read post]
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Vincent de Fontbrune v. Alan Wofsy, Docket No. 19-16913
5 Oct 2022, 3:00 am
Co. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2024, 5:30 am
Citing Exxon Mobil Corp. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2024, 5:30 am
Citing Exxon Mobil Corp. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 1:15 am
The First Department has issued their decision in Kremen v. [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 8:27 am
The defendant surely can expect suit there and elsewhere he purposefully targets with the conduct that induces the plaintiff’s suit. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 3:00 am
Hood v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 11:53 am
Co. v. [read post]