Search for: "Sellers v. Sellers" Results 5601 - 5620 of 6,089
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Sep 2008, 11:30 am
If the Americas Cup, were a competition among boats to see which could be the subject of the most celebrated lost volume seller case, the 1970 31-foot Broadwater "Bay Breeze" at issue in Neri v. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 11:54 am
From Brad Aronstam of Connolly Bove Lodge & Hutz: Last week, Vice Chancellor Noble of the Delaware Court of Chancery rendered this short opinion - in Henkel Corp. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2008, 3:55 pm
I’ll try not to be too geeky here, but the Ninth Circuit issued an opinion recently in Boschetto v. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 2:47 pm
Sadly, the sort of frictionless world of anxious sellers and cagey buyers that Lichtman assumes in his scholarship has become the foundation for really bad "fair use" precedent in Princeton University Press v. [read post]
26 Aug 2008, 3:18 am
Roberts v Saffell, ___ Mich App ___ (2008) (Lawyers Weekly No. 07-67463 - 12 pages) (published opinion) (Markey, J., joined by Wilder, J.) [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 11:16 am
NSCC guarantees the transactions it processes by assuming the obligation of sellers to deliver shares to buyers. [read post]
17 Aug 2008, 3:43 pm
2nd Circuit Court of Appeals, August 14, 2008 Chartschlaa v. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 9:42 am
Procter & Gamble Co. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 10:36 pm
However, the court rejected this argument and applied the standard set forth in the Supreme Court case Inwood Laboratories v. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 2:58 pm
Although it is really a competition law decision, last week's ruling of Mr Justice Morgan in Bookmakers' Afternoon Greyhound Services Ltd and others v Amalgamated Racing Ltd and others [2008] EWHC 1978 (Ch), a decision from the Chancery Division, England and Wales, should be of note to IP lawyers and owners too.Right: putting the cat before the horse? [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 8:35 am
Sony Computer Entertainment UK Ltd and another v Cinram Logistics UK Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 955; [2008] WLR (D) 289 “A manufacturer and seller of goods who lost them through the fault of another before he could make delivery and earn the price could recover that price as damages for their loss. [read post]