Search for: "State v. A. T. D."
Results 5601 - 5620
of 23,981
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Aug 2019, 6:03 am
Patents In Nokia v. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 3:17 am
” In Cotten v. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 1:21 am
The Court answered the question in the negative, considering that Member States cannot lay down additional exceptions outside of Article 5.The fourth question concerned "…whether Article 5(3)(d) of [Directive 2001/29] must be interpreted as meaning that the concept of ‘quotations'… extends to a situation in which it is not possible to identify the work concerned by the quotation in question".The Court first focussed on the requirements for… [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 1:21 am
The Court answered the question in the negative, considering that Member States cannot lay down additional exceptions outside of Article 5.The fourth question concerned "…whether Article 5(3)(d) of [Directive 2001/29] must be interpreted as meaning that the concept of ‘quotations'… extends to a situation in which it is not possible to identify the work concerned by the quotation in question".The Court first focussed on the requirements for… [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 1:42 pm
Squire v. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 1:20 pm
Last week, in State v. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 11:49 am
JB & Associates, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 11:48 am
Alexander v. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 8:10 am
In 2017, the Indian Supreme Court, in the case State Bank of India v Santosh Gupta, observed that even though Article 370 was labeled a “[t]emporary provision[]” and the Constituent Assembly had dissolved, the article “continue[s] to be in force” (¶12)—thus indicating it had attained permanent status. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 8:05 am
The first decision, Solera Holdings Inc. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2019, 4:30 am
F., Lee, D., & Pittenger, C. (2017). [read post]
10 Aug 2019, 8:03 am
Washington v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 5:13 pm
United States (2001), GPS location tracking in United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 2:31 pm
Tries to address 1A issues including US v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 12:44 pm
State of Texas v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 8:54 am
To support application of the escape clause in this case, the Department relies heavily on the decision in Amin v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 8:00 am
V is a real estate agent. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 7:33 am
Blockchain Luxembourg S.A. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am
Joaquin Castro (D-Tex.) tweeted have at least two things in common: they are all constituents in his district, and moreover, they all donated the maximum amount to President Trump’s campaign this year. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 9:33 am
GeoMetWatch Corp. v. [read post]