Search for: "State v. A. T. D." Results 5601 - 5620 of 23,981
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Aug 2019, 1:21 am by Jani Ihalainen
The Court answered the question in the negative, considering that Member States cannot lay down additional exceptions outside of Article 5.The fourth question concerned "…whether Article 5(3)(d) of [Directive 2001/29] must be interpreted as meaning that the concept of ‘quotations'… extends to a situation in which it is not possible to identify the work concerned by the quotation in question".The Court first focussed on the requirements for… [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 1:21 am by Jani Ihalainen
The Court answered the question in the negative, considering that Member States cannot lay down additional exceptions outside of Article 5.The fourth question concerned "…whether Article 5(3)(d) of [Directive 2001/29] must be interpreted as meaning that the concept of ‘quotations'… extends to a situation in which it is not possible to identify the work concerned by the quotation in question".The Court first focussed on the requirements for… [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 8:10 am by Laya Maheshwari
In 2017, the Indian Supreme Court, in the case State Bank of India v Santosh Gupta, observed that even though Article 370 was labeled a “[t]emporary provision[]” and the Constituent Assembly had dissolved, the article “continue[s] to be in force” (¶12)—thus indicating it had attained permanent status. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 2:31 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Tries to address 1A issues including US v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 8:54 am by Eugene Volokh
To support application of the escape clause in this case, the Department relies heavily on the decision in Amin v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Joaquin Castro (D-Tex.) tweeted have at least two things in common: they are all constituents in his district, and moreover, they all donated the maximum amount to President Trump’s campaign this year. [read post]