Search for: "State v. Burden"
Results 5601 - 5620
of 22,154
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Nov 2013, 6:13 am
That's what happened in State v. [read post]
12 Feb 2025, 5:00 am
In the case of Peterson v. [read post]
12 Feb 2025, 4:00 am
The complaint (full text) in Wyatt Bury, LLC v. [read post]
13 Feb 2025, 4:10 am
In Zubik v. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 4:00 am
The Appellate Division sustained the lower courts ruling, explaining that judicial review of an arbitrator's award is extremely limited and the party seeking to vacate an arbitration award "bears a heavy burden[,]' and must establish a ground for vacatur by clear and convincing evidence. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 6:20 am
Berger v. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 3:05 am
[Follow him on Twitter: @BillMcGev.]Abstract: In the two decades since the Supreme Court protected a crude rap spoof from copyright liability in Campbell v. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 10:00 pm
The Supreme Court recently released its opinion in Foster v North American Bus Industries, Inc. in which it reversed the trial court’s summary judgment in favor of the employer on a retaliatory discharge claim. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
Supreme Court granted NYPD's motion to dismiss Plaintiff's petition for failure to state a cause of action. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 2:32 pm
In Dobson, et al, v. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 7:50 am
Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of Am. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2013, 4:10 am
In Eagle Cove Camp & Conference Center, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 5:00 am
# # #DECISIONMatter of Cazzari v DiNapoli [read post]
11 May 2023, 11:37 am
” (Kim v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 6:00 am
Auth. v Transport Workers' Union of Am., Local 100 AFL-CIO, 6 NY3d 332*; 2. [read post]
31 May 2020, 8:31 am
In A.M. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 12:56 pm
Nocenzu Cusumano et al., Appellants, v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 6:00 am
Auth. v Transport Workers' Union of Am., Local 100 AFL-CIO, 6 NY3d 332*; 2. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 3:06 am
Vardhman Sancheti v. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 5:00 am
Since there was no direct evidence copying had taken place, the judge followed the leading authority Designers Guild, which stated that if the claimant demonstrates sufficient similarity and the defendant had prior access to the claimant’s work, the burden of proof passes to the defendant to satisfy the judge that the similarities did not result from copying. [read post]
