Search for: "State v. Core" Results 5601 - 5620 of 7,968
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 May 2021, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
The judge accepted that the false tweet by the celebrity doctor had cut Mrs Foster “to the core” and awarded damages of £125,000 . [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 2:46 am by Kelly
XX v HMRC (IP finance) United States US Patents  ‘Sub-standard’ patents cost the US economy over $25 billion a year. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 1:09 pm by Justin Florence, Larry Schwartztol
As our organization, United to Protect Democracy, pointed out in this memo, the Supreme Court held in United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 3:44 pm by Tobias Thienel
In Öcalan v Turkey (GC), paras 163-165, the Grand Chamber at least entertained the argument that the permission of the death penalty in Article 2 (2) of the Convention had been modified by the practice of the Contracting States since 1950. [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 8:06 am
  On the other hand, the hard places present their own challenges: (1) Russia re-emerging to embrace a role it had started placing well in the wake of the end of the Napoleonic Wars and takes up again, to replace the United States as the shadow under which Europe may be permitted to retain its wealth if not its power, and (2) China as a rising power, not yet militarily (though that is coming) but certainly in trade which poses the greatest threat to the core of the… [read post]
28 Jan 2007, 1:31 am
It is undeniable that there is a solid, anti-patent Supreme Court core consisting of Justices Breyer and Stevens. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 7:58 pm by Alex Duperouzel
See SFAT’s Decision (Wan Ten Lok and Yan Kwok Ting Sunny v SFC, Application No 8 and 9 of 2009, para 197). [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 4:15 am by SHG
And, indeed, that was no  doubt at the core of this prosecution. [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 12:49 pm by Ross
I don’t see the differences v. the Lenovo S10 that he does. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 7:34 am by Stephen Wermiel
On Wednesday, June 26, he shared his strong disagreement with the majority’s ruling striking down a portion of the Defense of Marriage Act in United States v. [read post]