Search for: "State v. Husband"
Results 5601 - 5620
of 7,277
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2011, 10:29 am
On February 28, 2008, Gomez presented defendant with a Zyprexa prescription (an antipsychotic drug), stating that it was for his girlfriend/wife. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 10:12 am
Luckow moved to have the spousal support modified, citing her ex-husband’s death and her increased expenses as a change in circumstances. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 8:53 am
Yes the Secretary of State has a power to include other forms of ill-treatment falling short of actual violence within s 177(1), but that had not been done because the SoS already believed that the word bore that wider meaning. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 6:11 am
A quick summary of Jones v Jones [2011] EWCA Civ 41, reported today:The facts: The parties were married in 1996, at which time the husband was the sole owner of a company. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 4:00 pm
(Eugene Volokh) The case, Yemshaw v. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 10:16 am
Yadav v. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 3:12 am
Mason v Dupont Direct Fin. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 2:35 pm
United States (09-1298); Boeing Company v. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 3:24 am
In interviews with housing officers, she complained of her husband’s behaviour, which included shouting in front of the children, and stated that she was scared that if she confronted him he might hit her. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 11:53 am
In People v. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 9:03 am
The most recent case that I was able to find is a 2007 case, Daskalov v. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 8:50 am
In 1999, Bill Wagner became a plaintiff in Howard v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 6:50 pm
If she can take the bench the day after her husband’s passing, she can make it to the State of the Union.Justice Stephen G. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:01 am
In the case of Barr v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:01 am
In the case of Barr v. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 11:16 am
" This issue seemingly came up in an unreported (non-precedential) decision in the matter of Tuman v. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 7:40 am
The Meloche v. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 1:15 am
The case clearly raises problems somewhat similar to the famous Pretty v United Kingdom judgment of the Court in 2002, in which the European Court held that the refusal to guarantee the non-prosecution of the husband of the terminally ill Diane Pretty did not violate human rights. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 6:08 pm
Several years back, however, in a case that any first-year law student will also know (the mighty United States v. [read post]
