Search for: "State v. Plan"
Results 5601 - 5620
of 29,601
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Dec 2020, 5:01 am
[Not for secular courts to judge, holds the Arizona Court of Appeals] From In re Ball v. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 4:10 am
In 2018, the Michigan Civil Rights Commission in Interpretive Statement 2018-1 concluded that:as used in the Elliott Larsen Civil Rights Act “discrimination because of... sex” includes discrimination because of gender identity and discrimination because of sexual orientation.Now in Rouch World, LLC v. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
In Ball v. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 9:26 am
As discussed in detail in my book The Grasping Hand: Kelo v. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 7:44 am
Tillis plans to release a draft next week. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 6:53 am
In Battiston v Microsoft Canada Inc (“Microsoft”), an employee was wrongfully dismissed because his employer had failed to bring a harsh termination clause to his attention. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
The most time-sensitive among those cases is Trump v. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 9:01 pm
In the first four parts of our series on the California v. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 6:49 pm
Program v. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 11:52 am
The plaintiff learned this the hard way in the case of Sarah Leitner v. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 11:04 am
Buckley v. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 7:33 am
Unites States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 7:15 am
There are massive variations in chapter 7 vs. 13 filing rates by state—some states have a 7 culture and some have a 13 culture. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 2:31 pm
From Milanov v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 12:31 pm
The decision is Pham v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 9:14 am
Hersh v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 7:28 am
On Oct. 21, President Trump issued an executive order that, for many federal employees, effectively overturned the civil service system that has existed in the United States since 1883. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 11:10 pm
Lord Justice Arnold recapped the current position in England and Wales with regards to website-blocking, noting 20th Century Fox v BT (Newzbin 2) wherein he granted the first such injunction in 2011, and the first application and injunction in relation to trade marks in Cartier v Sky. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 1:16 pm
In short, the NCD and Office of the NCD would resemble the structure of the Office of the United States Trade Representative, albeit with a smaller scale. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 12:39 am
At the oral hearing the appellant stated that clarifying the situation and planning further steps between the representative and the appellant had taken six weeks, so that an earlier filing of the request for correction was not possible.5.9 However, the Board is of the opinion that the complainant's submission cannot justify the late submission of the request for correction. [read post]
