Search for: "Strong v. Strong"
Results 5601 - 5620
of 19,637
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2014, 11:38 pm
Similarly, when all is said and done in Alice v. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:05 pm
v. [read post]
1 Aug 2020, 3:43 am
Mr Justice Warby was a strong advocate of the creation of the new Media and Communications List (replacing the old “Jury List” as jury trials became a thing of the past). [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 1:49 pm
See S.W.D. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 12:41 am
Almost one year ago, the IPKat reported on Force India Formula One Team Ltd v Etihad Airways PJSC and Aldar Properties PJSC [2009] EWHC 2768 (QB), a Queen's Bench (England and Wales) decision of Sir Charles Gray (see the IPKat earlier post here). [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 8:29 am
Aptix Corp. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 1:59 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 3:54 am
Amy Howe analyzes yesterday’s argument in Monasky v. [read post]
6 Jan 2007, 6:49 pm
State v. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 1:01 am
” It did so by overturning Roe v. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 5:01 am
Thus, the Court must determine whether the plaintiff has a substantial privacy right which outweighs the strong First Amendment interest in public proceedings articulated in Doe v. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 2:05 pm
Sarver v. [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 2:43 pm
There never was any doubt that the question of whether the infringement of a single design patent by a complex, multifunctional product warrants an unapportioned disgorgement of profits would be an extraordinarily important one. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 8:52 am
So, as per SBP v. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 1:39 pm
In Rudolph v. [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 9:04 am
Grange v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 7:35 am
Such arguments should be moot, however, as I think the argument for displacement is exceedingly strong. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 7:18 pm
Each one (and especially Kennedy) has a pretty strong free speech libertarian streak. [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 7:47 am
Neither Terrapin v Builders Supply Co (Hayes) [1967] RPC 375 nor Cranleigh Precision Engineering Ltd v Bryant [1965] 1 WLR 1293 QBD was authority for that proposition [If Kats could blush, this one would be pretty pink -- he's sure he has persuaded a generation of students of the opposite, confident that Speed Seal Products Ltd v Paddington [1985] 1 WLR 1327 CA said this was the case];* There was strong authority for the proposition that publication of… [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 9:44 am
See Baze v. [read post]
