Search for: "T. R. W. " Results 5601 - 5620 of 8,399
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Feb 2010, 1:11 pm by Adam Thierer
Products and prices become more competitive as a result—even for consumers who don’t bargain-hunt. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 8:25 am
So the question isn't so simple: Under UCC § 2-719(1)(b), '[r]esort to a remedy as provided is optional unless the remedy is expressly agreed to be exclusive, in which case it is the sole remedy.' However, '[w]here circumstances cause an exclusive or limited remedy to fail of its essential purpose, remedy may be had as provided in this code.' UCC § 2-719(2). ... [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 12:35 pm by Kevin M. Mazza, Esq.
I can’t tell you how many times we receive a draft CIS filled in by a client that include expense figures, particularly on the Schedule C Personal Expense column which seem out of whack – – whether too high, too low or without any entry whatsoever. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 1:55 pm
That legislation, signed by President George W. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 10:56 am by Eugene Volokh
[R]elying on Red Lion, the Court noted that “broadcasting ... has received the most limited First Amendment protection. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 2:52 pm by Steven G. Pearl
Although certification inquiries such as commonality, typicality, and predominance might properly call for some substantive inquiry, “[t]he court may not go so far ... as to judge the validity of these claims. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 9:25 pm
" http://t.co/J3Zyrsf B-DE: Not def's fraudulent intent that must be pled w/particularity per FRCP 9(b) but circumstances constituting fraud. http://t.co/2BUowz2 B-CO rejects investor argument they had no valid contract to purchase stock & thus had unsecured debt not w/in §510(b). http://t.co/RvgLduA B-CO reviews policies behind & broad interp of §510(b) mandatory subord. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 6:04 am
He didn't attempt to publish until years after the event, at a time when he needed the money (inter alia, he was in jail). [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 6:28 pm
"[W]hile definitely not good form, the mistake was a missed shortcut made by one of our admin people and is not related to the efforts or systems involved in source protection," Lim wrote. [read post]