Search for: "United States v. Close" Results 5601 - 5620 of 14,194
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2014, 10:03 am by Andrew Hamm
Driehaus The students are again closely divided over the outcome in this dispute over state regulation of political speech. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 3:02 pm by Elina Saxena, Cody M. Poplin
” Khamenei also accused the United States of trying to divide Iraq along sectarian lines and urged Iraqis to oppose any such U.S. efforts. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 9:44 am by Kevin Johnson
Deputy Solicitor General Malcom Stewart began for the United States by “stress[ing] the breadth of Congress’s constitutional authority to establish the rules under which aliens will be allowed to enter and remain in the United States. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 10:53 am by Kevin
  Here's the first sentence from Dockery v. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 9:49 am by Rachael Hanna
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit decided United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 7:49 am by Ilya Shapiro
United States, the First Amendment broadly protects political expression in order to “assure [the] unfettered interchange of ideas for the bringing about of political and social changes desired by the people. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 12:13 pm by Jeffrey Brown
LEXIS 23791 (9th Cir. 2011) (affirming United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 2:20 pm by Orin Kerr
I wonder, though, what Jonathan makes of this passage from United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 9:49 am by Steve Statsinger
Here are two more interesting summary orders.In United States v. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 4:40 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
WHO IS ELIGIBLE FOR PROVISIONAL UNLAWFUL PRESENCE WAIVER Individuals will be able to apply for a Provisional Unlawful Presence Waiver starting March 4, 2013 if he/she meets the following eligibility criteria: (i) Is present in the United States at the time of filing the application for a provisional unlawful presence waiver and for biometrics collection; (ii) Upon departure, would be inadmissible only under section 212(a)(9)(B)(i) of the Act at the time of the immigrant visa… [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 8:00 pm
Now the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, which has jurisdiction over all patent appeals, has handed down a landmark ruling in the case of In Re Bilski. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 7:22 am
Neither party attempted to quantify the risk created by the defendant's conduct; and vague words such as "substantial" are not a satisfactory substitute for data, as we remarked in United States v. [read post]