Search for: "United States v. Robert" Results 5601 - 5620 of 9,871
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2014, 9:23 am by Shawn R. Dominy
That question was recently addressed by the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 8:11 am by Walter Olson
” If recent Roberts Court precedents like Shelby County and Citizens United are any guide, Harris is a warning shot that the Abood regime is not long for this world and that the next case will be the one to vindicate all public workers’ First Amendment rights. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 6:43 am by Wells Bennett
Expectation of privacy underlies decisions in such cases as United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 5:23 pm by INFORRM
It points out that 83 MEPs from the 6 largest parliamentary groups and from 18 different member states have signed up to the 10 point “WePromiseEU” Charter. [read post]
28 Jun 2014, 5:08 am by Walter Olson
” — Chief Justice Roberts, writing for the Court in Riley v. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 2:43 pm by Donald Thompson
 Justice Roberts, who wrote for the majority, stated, “These cases require us to decide how the search incident to arrest doctrine applies to modern cell phones, which are now such a pervasive and insistent part of daily life that the proverbial visitor from Mars might conclude they were an important feature of human anatomy. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 10:14 am by Ritika Singh
ABC News indicates that Secretary of State John Kerry met yesterday with foreign ministers from Jordan, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) to discuss a Middle Eastern response to the crisis in Iraq. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm by John Dean
For example, a person could be dismissed from government service if there were “reasonable grounds . . . for belief that the person involved [was] disloyal to the Government of the United States. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 11:23 am by Todd Dawson
The United States Supreme Court held today that President Obama’s 2012 appointments to the National Labor Relations Board were not valid recess appointments under the United States Constitution. [read post]