Search for: "A B C Insurance" Results 5621 - 5640 of 5,821
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Aug 2007, 6:05 am
Personally, I'd rather pay the few extra bucks and keep my skull;And finally:Blawg Review #123 is up at Texas Appellate Law blog;Grand Rounds is up at Rickety Contrivances of Doing Good, for those with medical interests;The Cavalcade of Risk is hosted this week by Health Affairs;Food poisoning legal guru Bill Marler is the focus of a long (and flattering) magazine profile;Trial Ad Notes reports that B-List and C-List celebrities seek new life on Jury Duty, coming to… [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 7:04 am
"  Plaintiffs did not deny that they are "industrial insureds," but maintained that they are entitled to the exemption from § 38a-271(c) that is contained in § 38a-271(b)(2), which states in relevant part that "[t]he provisions of sections 38a-271 to 38a-278, inclusive . . . do not apply to . . . (2) the lawful transaction of reinsurance by insurers . . . . [read post]
26 Aug 2007, 7:25 am
      The loss of PITP may be compensated by:  (a) restoring the property to its creator; (b) and removing it from its unauthorized online location; (c) attributing the PITP to the creator on the online location; or, (d) recompense of the creator's actual loss. [read post]
24 Aug 2007, 11:08 pm
The court limited review to the following issue: Does an employee bonus plan based on a profit figure that is reduced by a store's expenses, including the cost of workers compensation insurance and cash and inventory losses, violate (a) Business and Professions Code section 17200, (b) Labor Code sections 221, 400 through 410, or 3751, or (c) California Code of Regulations, title 8, section 11070? [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 12:33 pm
June 28, 2007.Here is a link to the decision.This case was originally digested by Sarah Swan and edited by David Pilley.A condominium development was being built in four stages: A, B, C, and D. [read post]
22 Aug 2007, 6:30 pm
S128576 (B165498/B168668 - Los Angeles County Superior Court - BC254143) Argued in Los Angeles 6-06-07 Does an employee bonus plan based on a profit figure that is reduced by a store's expenses, including the cost of workers' compensation insurance and cash and inventory losses, violate (a) Business and Professions Code section 17200; (b) Labor Code sections 221, 400 through 410, or 3751; or (c) California Code of Regulations, title 8, section 11070? [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 6:48 am
(A) 45,000 (B) 9,373 (C) 6 (D) 0 If you answered (D), go ahead and treat yourself to a Cinnabon this morning! [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 7:20 am
Connaught Laboratories, Inc., 658 A2d 715, 718 (N.J. 1995) ("[b]y bringing suit against . . . plaintiffs have waived the physician-patient privilege"); Nelson v. [read post]
8 Aug 2007, 10:00 am
("NOW") appeals the order of the Unemployment Insurance Review Board of the Indiana Department of Workforce Development ("the Board") that determined that Tommy C. [read post]
7 Aug 2007, 8:40 am
  The court further concluded that (a) it is only notice of the proposed settlement that legally, and logically, requires action within a reasonable time by the UIM carrier; (b) ten days, which is all the time that elapsed between the insureds’ notification to the insurer of the imminence of the policy-limits settlement and the insureds’ release of the alleged tortfeasor, did not provide the requisite reasonable notice; and… [read post]
7 Aug 2007, 8:27 am
In the case, one insurer alleged that another insurer and two insurance services companies conspired to wrongfully transfer certain high-loss motor vehicle insurance business. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 6:16 pm
VPA §2002(a)(2)(D) (as amended by TRIA §201(c)(4)). [read post]