Search for: "California v. Law"
Results 5621 - 5640
of 33,829
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2014, 1:18 pm
Frey also filed a special motion to dismiss the state law claims under California's anti-SLAPP law. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 7:09 am
Briefly: Sentencing Law and Policy has a post on yesterday’s statement respecting the denial of certiorari in Gamache v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 5:31 am
Montana joins California, Colorado, Connecticut, Indiana, Iowa, Tennessee, Utah, and Virginia in enacting a comprehensive consumer privacy law. [read post]
31 May 2011, 7:39 pm
(Thanks to Rick Hasen, of the University of California, Irvine School of Law, for the heads-up about the new briefing order. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 10:27 am
In Park v. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 4:00 am
Co. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 1:40 pm
Supreme Court ruled on the case of Glossip v. [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 4:28 pm
The Riverside County Superior Court just granted a motion filed by Compassion & Choices on behalf of two terminally ill Californians seeking to intervene in the Ahn v. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 12:46 pm
In McPherson v. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 12:50 pm
In State of California, ex rel, Xavier Becerra v. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 2:56 pm
California: Hotel Worker Can Sue Hotel for Sexual Assault by Non-Employee Trespasser On October 26, 2017, a California Court of Appeal ruled in M.F. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 4:17 am
Two weeks ago I wrote about the folks at Drug and Device Law getting a lot of press as a result of Wyeth v. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 9:09 am
Case citation: hiQ Labs, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 11:44 am
A California appellate court demonstrated the considerable extensiveness of the rights of employees to be free from discrimination in the workplace with its recent decision in Rope v. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 12:57 pm
The saga continues in Arizona v. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 4:19 pm
Please be sure to visit www.hardinglaw.com, the website for the law firm of Harding & Associates, for more information on California family law. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 2:36 am
In National Union Fire Insurance Co. v. [read post]
7 May 2014, 5:41 am
Plaintiff’s putative class action complaint alleged that product labels on 51 varieties of Twinings tea, and statements contained on the Twinings website, violated California’s Unfair Competition Law, California’s False Advertising Law, and the Consumer Legal Remedies Act. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 6:00 am
In Biljac Associates v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 12:51 pm
Lobatoz v. [read post]
