Search for: "Case v. People" Results 5621 - 5640 of 52,001
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2012, 1:30 am by seo
Constitution states in part that the "right of the people to be secure in their persons . . . against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated….' Last month's decision by the United States Supreme Court in the case of Florence v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 1:30 am by seo
Constitution states in part that the "right of the people to be secure in their persons . . . against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated….' Last month's decision by the United States Supreme Court in the case of Florence v. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 3:45 am by Russ Bensing
It’s an interesting case. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 7:30 am by Mathew Purchase, Matrix
He applied his Guidance on the Identification of the Ordinary Residence of People in Need of Community Care Services, England, which purported to apply the House of Lords judgment in R v Barnet LBC, ex parte Shah [1983] 2 AC 309 and Turner J’s judgment in R v Waltham Forest, ex parte Vale The Times, 25 February 1985. [read post]
16 May 2018, 10:37 pm by Anthony Gaughan
Kennedy not only joined the 5-justice majority in Casey, but also the 5-justice majority in the 2016 case of Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 4:19 pm by Stephen Bilkis
However, as the trial court properly observed, the defense counsel opened the door to this challenged testimony like in the cases of People v Torres, People v Martinez, People v Ocean and People v Koury. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 12:49 pm
Governor Newsom Files Historic Amicus Brief in Death Penalty Case, Arguing for Greater Protections Against Racial Bias in Jury Proceedings Builds on Governor’s actions to end the death penalty in California and address systemic racism in the criminal justice systemGovernor Gavin Newsom today filed an amicus brief in People v. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 12:41 pm by Donald Thompson
We should respond that these questions address the ability of a potential juror to be fair and impartial, an area of inquiry in which a trial court is more apt to commit error (see CPL § 270.20[1][b]; People v Arnold, 96 NY2d 358 [2001]; People v Johnson, 94 NY2d 600 [2000]; People v Lewis, 71 AD3d 1582 [4th Dept 2010]; People v Habte, 35 AD3d 1199 [4th  Dept 2006]). [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 8:27 am by INFORRM
This is the Appendix to the Judgment in Monroe v Hopkins, handed down on 10 March 2017. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
It was legal for 48 years straight—from the Supreme Court’s decision in Roe v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 12:00 am
The leading authority for many years has been Hunt v- Severs (1994). [read post]