Search for: "Compli, Inc." Results 5621 - 5640 of 11,553
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2015, 3:31 pm
KQED, Inc., 438 U.S. 1, 11 (1978) (stating that “[t]here is an undoubted right to gather news ‘from any source by means within the law’” (quoting Branzburg v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 7:28 am
  Would the same law “compel” patients to comply with doctor’s orders and refrain from other risky behavior that jeapordizes the possible success of their treatments? [read post]
14 May 2015, 12:57 am by INFORRM
  Aside from the difficulties that Google and other internet intermediaries are having in determining what is inaccurate, out of date and irrelevant, the reported English cases since Costeja, most notably Daniel Hegglin v Google Inc ([2014] EWHC 2808 (QB)) and Max Mosley v Google Inc and Google Limited ([2015 ] EWHC 59 (QB)) have highlighted a very significant tension between data protection law and the law of defamation and other content laws (including Article 8 privacy and… [read post]
13 May 2015, 8:27 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Hain Celestial Group, Inc., 2015 WL 2168374, No. 14–cv–5029 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
11 May 2015, 3:15 am by Kevin LaCroix
The government also alleged that while the subsidiary had policies and procedures to ensure that it did not violate U.S. sanctions, it failed to train its personnel to ensure that they complied with the sanctions requirements. [read post]
8 May 2015, 2:02 pm by Karen Gullo
Making that question difficult, when it should be simple, seems to be the government’s leading strategy in a hearing this week in Twitter Inc. [read post]
8 May 2015, 1:03 pm
Schneider Nat’l Carriers, Inc., 263 F.3d 816, 819 (8th Cir. 2001) (citation omitted). [read post]
8 May 2015, 5:12 am by Patricia Salkin
  In Re Appeal of MDY Taxes Inc and Village Car Wash, Inc., 2015 WL 1780196 (VT 4/17/2015) The opinion can be accessed at: http://law.justia.com/cases/vermont/supreme-court/2015/2014-140.htmlFiled under: Current Caselaw, Standing [read post]
7 May 2015, 7:56 am by John Jascob
On September 4, 2013, Copley Fund, Inc. submitted an application with the SEC requesting an exemption from Rule 22c-1 under the Investment Company Act and Rule 4-01(a)(1) of Regulation S-X. [read post]
7 May 2015, 5:00 am by Doug Cornelius
It’s not a fun discussion when trying to comply with regulatory requirements. [read post]
6 May 2015, 7:30 am by Steven Koprince
URS Federal Services, Inc. submitted a proposal as a prospective prime contractor. [read post]