Search for: "DOE v. UNITED STATES"
Results 5621 - 5640
of 44,317
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2008, 3:42 am
The United States District Court for the District of Connecticut, Judge Eginton, has ruled in the case of E.K. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2008, 8:34 pm
In United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 8:04 am
Ever since the Solicitor General filed a petition for certiorari in December on behalf of the government in United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 3:17 pm
In Acetris Health LLC v. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 8:05 am
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 9:28 am
United States, 45 Fed. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 1:31 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 6:38 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 11:16 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 3:42 pm
Superior Court (2007) 42 Cal.4th 443 (Gentry) has been abrogated by recent United States Supreme Court precedent. [read post]
20 Jul 2007, 1:52 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 4:33 pm
United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:31 am
The United States Supreme Court released its decision in Blueford v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 9:01 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 7:39 pm
(Backer, Tweaking Facts, Speaking Judgment: Judicial Transmogrification of Case Narrative as Jurisprudence in the United States and Britain, Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal 6:611, 616 (1998).)This insight may help untangle some of the discursive trajectories in the case and the declaraitons. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 1:02 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 1:08 pm
The Court stated that "[o]ffense . . . does not equate to coercion. [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 11:01 am
United States, 98 U.S. 145 (1878)). [read post]
30 Apr 2023, 2:06 pm
The United States Supreme Court vacated the affirmance in June 2022, when it granted Uber’s petition for writ of certiorari and remanded the case for further consideration in light of Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 8:38 am
Citizens United v. [read post]