Search for: "David Reader" Results 5621 - 5640 of 8,122
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Oct 2009, 1:14 am
Longtime and careful readers of the blog know our outright hatred of the evil genius, his pretty boy QB, and that entire cheating mess of chowder eating bean heads from Bahstan. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 12:27 pm
   You avid readers know our position on who bears the burden of proof, but if you have forgotten or if you are new, see our law review article on the subject.) [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 11:16 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Prospective readers will want to understand, however, that this volume addresses the federal securities laws’ substantive provisions and requirements. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 6:54 am by Nabiha Syed
David Savage and Ian Duncan examine the Justices’ travel at the Los Angeles Times. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 7:12 am by David Lat
(A spokesperson for O’Melveny declined to comment.)In addition, readers brought to our attention two O’Melveny partner departures from this year that didn’t appear in our earlier list. [read post]
20 May 2015, 10:41 am by INFORRM
Walter Merricks CBE, Chair of IMPRESS, said:  ‘IMPRESS aims to meet the demand from those news publishers who see the benefits in independent regulation, the protections it affords them and the assurance it gives to their readers. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 8:47 pm
between posts of extraordinary depth and insight, who are we readers to complain? [read post]
30 Sep 2007, 8:32 am
Here's the first and last paragraphs of the review followed by an interview with David Frost. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 3:24 pm
Chicago IP attorney David Donoghue agrees that violent threats serve no constructive purpose in the blogosphere. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 10:01 pm by Coral Beach
“Nothing has been ruled out as a root cause,” said FDA’s health communications specialist David Steigman. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 12:15 pm by Kevin
Update: A reader points out (thanks, David) that the U.S. likely had no jurisdiction to actually prosecute these people anyway because they committed the crimes outside the U.S. and neither they nor their victims were Americans at the time. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 9:27 am
UPDATE: The Chicago Tribune's editorial page editor Bruce Dold tells THREAT LEVEL: "I decided we would run a correction after readers brought this to our attention. [read post]
8 Nov 2006, 10:24 am
Update:  Thursday November 9, 9:10 am Charlie Green, co-author with David Maister of "The Trusted Advisor", is, I'm pleased to report, a regular reader of "Adam Smith, Esq. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 3:33 am by Maxwell Kennerly
The law professors were understandably unhappy with their names being attached to a worthless supplement which not only failed to provide any new information, but which misled readers into thinking that the information contained in the textbook was more current than it actually was. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 6:35 am by South Florida Lawyers
  And the reader thus has no ability to judge the present positions against the historical record.This important historical context is not very hard to locate btw.In fact, we covered the very question of the Marlins' financial condition when Roberto Martinez went into Judge Escharte's courtroom back in June of 2008 and specifically asked for public disclosure of that information because Dave Samson -- incredibly, in my view -- refused to answer any questions about the topic… [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 4:27 am by SHG
If this content is not in your news reader, it means the page you are viewing infringes copyright. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 5:10 pm by INFORRM
As readers of this blog site will know, and as Alan Rusbridger noted at the Levenson seminar, the number of times newspapers have pleaded the public interest defence in privacy actions is close to zero. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 4:00 am
  The case was brought to our attention by the New York Law Digest, No. 589, January 2009, edited by David D. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 8:52 pm
If this content is not in your news reader, it makes the page you are viewing an infringement of the copyright. [read post]