Search for: "Defendants A-F" Results 5621 - 5640 of 29,824
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jan 2012, 4:09 am
They talked to defendant’s longtime live-in companion told them he wasn’t home. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 8:36 pm
  Constitent with the many courts that have visited this issue since the Supreme Court’s decision in F. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:05 am
District Attorney Dan Conley recently indicated that 'community members' helped find the criminal suspects, though Boston Police Commissioner Edward F. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 1:58 am
iStock_000000556844_L2.jpg In litigation for failure to warn of breast cancer risk from hormone replacement therapy, plaintiff's expert's testimony as to specific causation (that the defendant's hormone replacement drugs were the cause of the plaintiff's breast cancer) was admissible; fact that plaintiff also had independent "breast cancer risk factors and a family history" of breast cancer did not undermine admissibility of expert's… [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 8:15 am
The Circuit Court also ruled that the Michigan workers' compensation act did not reverse preempt RICO under the McCarran-Ferguson Act.Brown v Cassens Transport Co. 546 F.3d 347 (6th Cir. 2009). [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 10:05 pm
(Can't find a good, general google link for it, but it's 626 F. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 7:14 pm by Jeffrey Brown
The defendant had videoed children showering and changing clothes on church trips while he was serving as a chaperone. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 1:53 pm
In this case, the defendant was not only under some restraining order, but he had been previous arrested for violating that order. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 9:20 am by Jonathan F. Marshall
The dedicated New Jersey DWI defense attorneys of The Law Offices of Jonathan F. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 3:53 pm by Jon Sands
Flynt, 756 F.2d 1352 (9th Cir. 1985) weighed in favor of granting a continuance, and a denial was unreasonable. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 12:33 pm by Stan Gibson
LEXIS 93376, at *15 (rejecting the defense argument that plaintiff would not be prejudiced by allowing them to belatedly include additional prior art references in their invalidity contentions; “[i]f the Court were to accept Defendants’ . . . argument, parties would always be permitted to explain their invalidity contentions at the eleventh hour[,]” which would cut against the express purpose of the Patent Local Rules, which seek to “facilitate the speedy,… [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 10:24 am by Angela Haynes
Berry, 164 F.3d 844 (3d Cir. 1999), the court held that the “Bartkus exception” to the Dual Sovereignty rule did not apply because the defendants failed to show that state authorities acted as puppets in conducting a sham prosecution in anticipation of the federal proceedings. [read post]