Search for: "Doe VI"
Results 5621 - 5640
of 5,651
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2006, 10:08 am
i’ve officially beaten that reference in the title (Henry VI, part II) into the ground so you won’t be seeing it anymore (well, maybe once again down the road … ). anyway, here is the first of the conversations between me (m) and my erstwhile attorney-programmer-web-entrepreneur-former partner (k). [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 3:43 am
Indeed, there is probably no treaty of any significance that can be made today that does not interfere with some existing federal statute. [read post]
30 Nov 2006, 4:04 pm
We wrap it all up in Part VI, Unenumerated Rights and the Future of Constitutional Doctrine. [read post]
30 Nov 2006, 8:46 am
Among the main alterations, the amended policy does not contain a selective opt-out provision. [read post]
28 Nov 2006, 6:14 am
With such a divided court, we may well see Amgen VI in the Supreme Court. [read post]
23 Nov 2006, 10:29 pm
The Copyright Act does not protect ideas so copyright only comes into being when the ideas are recorded, written down or transmitted. [read post]
14 Nov 2006, 4:54 am
" A "broker-dealer" does not include, among other listed persons and entities:"a bank or savings institution if its activities as a broker-dealer are limited to those specified in subsections 3(a)(4)(B)(i) through (vi), (viii) through (x), and (xi) if limited to unsolicited transactions; 3(a)(5)(B); and 3(a)(5)(C) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. [read post]
1 Nov 2006, 5:09 pm
Should that website be accorded probative value vis-Ã -vis the use of American English? [read post]
1 Nov 2006, 1:30 pm
A declaration was passed by Munich staff as part of a demonstration outside of the Administrative Council also demands that the President of the EPO:respect the requirements of the European Patent Convention and the EPO Service Regulations, and stop the further degradation of the Service Regulations,respect prior commitments of the administration concerning the reporting system and the pension contributions,give staff both the technical means and the time to fulfil their obligations… [read post]
25 Oct 2006, 8:07 am
Neither does the signature sheet state that the text of the proposed changes is attached to it. [read post]
25 Oct 2006, 12:17 am
Wilson also alleged that the Vatican's Swiss Guards once had to break up a slugfest involving Sam Walton and Pope Pius VI, whom he'd royally pissed off. [read post]
19 Oct 2006, 12:48 pm
Althouse's view of the MCA vis-a-vis the Court, but I do think it is significant to note that the MCA does in fact suggest that the Hamdan Court was wrong in its interpretation of the Detainee Treatment Act (especially) and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. [read post]
17 Oct 2006, 5:36 am
It's a "useful and effective tool" to launch discussions with the private sector and foreign governments. 9:56 Q: What are luxury goods vis a visa North Korea? [read post]
9 Oct 2006, 8:31 am
UPDATE -- It's now being covered by many of the big legal blogs, like Discourse, TalkLeft, and How Appealing.Here is the motion.The argument section starts out like this:"Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster. [read post]
29 Sep 2006, 12:43 pm
The panel simply sided with the EC (vis-Ã -vis some of its Member states). [read post]
6 Sep 2006, 4:51 am
"Counsel's failure to file a motion to suppress does not mean that petitioner did not have the opportunity to litigate this claim. [read post]
3 Sep 2006, 12:50 pm
Is there an argument that the diplomatic-relations exception does not preclude a claim to protected-person status by, say, David Hicks of Australia? [read post]
29 Aug 2006, 4:13 pm
Given the status of patents as property, these and other state actions raise questions concerning the constitutional limitations imposed on the government vis-Ã -vis the patents it grants to inventors. [read post]
12 Aug 2006, 7:14 am
(C) Subparagraph (A) does not apply if– (i) the end user is an agency or department of the United States Government that procures the report from the person for purposes of determining the eligibility of the consumer to whom the report relates to receive access or continued access to classified information (as defined in section 1681b(b)(4)(E)(i) of this title); and (ii) the head of the agency or department makes a written finding as prescribed under section 1681b(b)(4)(A)… [read post]
26 Jul 2006, 6:01 am
The GATS today does not contain a direct requirement that domestic regulatory measures be the least trade restrictive (Article VI:5 combines this test with a nullification or impairment requirement). [read post]
