Search for: "Does 1 - 23" Results 5621 - 5640 of 15,479
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Aug 2018, 4:44 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Hoskins that a foreign national who does not otherwise fall within the specific categories of defendants enumerated in the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”) cannot be held liable for violating the FCPA under accomplice liability theories.[1]  Stating that the FCPA does not “purport[] to rule the world,” the Second Circuit held that the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) cannot skirt the FCPA’s “carefully-drawn… [read post]
30 Aug 2018, 10:40 am by Brian Hall
In FLSA2018-23, WHD concluded that an employer whose food services operations were functionally integrated with its movie theatre operations was entitled to the FLSA’s motion picture theater exemption in Section 13(b)(27). [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 7:03 am by Dan Carvajal
Thirty-two states are acting to pass laws or regulations to require sales tax collection by remote sellers now or in the immediate future: Preexisting prior to Wayfair: Pennsylvania & Rhode Island (both give retailers a choice between collecting tax or complying with notice-and-reporting laws) July 1, 2018: Colorado (notice-and-reporting only), Hawaii, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Vermont September 1, 2018: Mississippi October 1, 2018: Alabama, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky,… [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 4:50 pm by Michel-Adrien
The SCC has now specified in the Docket that the deadline for motions to intervene is October 23, 2018.The text to CALL members goes on the address the pros and cons of the association seeking to intervene in front of the Supreme Ciourt. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 2:45 am by Jessica Kroeze
Whilst it might be assumed that claim 1 as filed on 23 April 2012 was the subject of the telephone consultation of 15 May 2012, there is no indication that the outstanding deficiencies were discussed in substance and the contested decision does not refer to the telephone consultation at all. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 11:30 pm by Nico Cordes
The appellant essentially argues that the rationale of G 1/10 does not apply in the present case because the factual circumstances underlying the case to be decided by the then referring board in G 1/10 were different from those underlying the present case.It is true that the facts of the case at hand differ from those of the above case leading to the referral in G 1/10, in that it concerns neither an error in a document introduced by an applicant nor a situation… [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 6:52 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  The new Vermont “Act Relating to the Prevention of Sexual Harassment” does not prohibit nondis [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 2:56 pm by Guest Blogger
Longley sent the following message to members on August 23. [read post]
But it does highlight concerns about the potential use of the documents required to be maintained, which contains, by definition, only allegations of sexual misconduct. [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 6:00 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
Therefore, the Court sided with the worker’s argument based on ss. 11(5), 63(1)(a), 64(1) and 65(1) of the Employment Standards Act, 2000 that until employment is completed, the claim for severance pay does not crystalize. [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 4:00 am by Administrator
The requirement that requests for accommodation fit into a Western paradigm does violence to the Indigenous traditions. [read post]