Search for: "HOPE v. STATE" Results 5621 - 5640 of 16,490
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am by chief
In Kay v Lambeth [2006] 2 AC 465 the majority of the House of Lords established that, where a landlord has an otherwise unqualified right to possession, there are only two scenarios where the court should not proceed to summary judgment and an order for possession, which have since become known as gateways (a) and (b) (Lord Hope's now famous [110]). [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am by chief
In Kay v Lambeth [2006] 2 AC 465 the majority of the House of Lords established that, where a landlord has an otherwise unqualified right to possession, there are only two scenarios where the court should not proceed to summary judgment and an order for possession, which have since become known as gateways (a) and (b) (Lord Hope's now famous [110]). [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 6:34 am by Joy Waltemath
That same month, a federal district court in South Texas issued an injunction in United States v. [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 1:39 pm by Gregory Forman
 While having an attorney who is afraid to take a case to trial is a serious disadvantage, having an attorney who is too eager to take a case to trial is also counterproductive. ________________________ [1]As of October 11, 2010, the Supreme Court is still considering a review request from the April 3, 2008 Court of Appeals decision in State v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 10:42 am
We'll highlight just a couple of the stand-out moments below:In the case of Caperton v. [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 2:31 pm
That way, Viking Line hoped to compete with other booze cruise ferries on the same route. [read post]
26 Oct 2006, 8:32 am
Instead, the State relies on last Friday's opinion in Purcell v. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  The diverging approaches of the majority and the dissenters in United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
At best, it hopes to have evidence at trial. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 3:05 am by Walter Olson
It is worth making explicit the parallels between the Supreme Court’s acknowledgment of the first in New York Times v. [read post]