Search for: "Hope v. Hope"
Results 5621 - 5640
of 23,985
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Dec 2009, 7:33 am
By Eric Goldman Third Education Group, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 4:03 am
The court noted that this qualified the dicta of Lord Hope in Dabas v High Court of Justice in Madrid, Spain [2007] UKHL 6, which had rejected the proposition that the validity of an EAW could “be eked out by extraneous information,” where the requirements set out in s 2(2) of the 2003 Act were concerned. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 11:30 am
Citing Gordon v. [read post]
26 Nov 2007, 2:50 pm
As Rick pointed out this past weekend, the highly-anticipated ERISA case of LaRue v. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 3:45 pm
In many respects he is our ambassador in the courts and community," said Tejash V. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 9:02 am
Therefore, the Court found Vermont's Confidentiality of Prescription Information statute to be unconstitutional as it currently stands in Sorrell v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 7:33 pm
This unpublished opinion in this case (Moran v. [read post]
17 Feb 2013, 3:17 pm
As it appears that Mr Gopee has on at least one occasion continued to pursue proceedings (including appearing in the appeal permission in the last post) for Barons Finance Limited, despite the company having been wound up and a liquidator having been appointed by the Court, we hope this post might be of use for people acting for Defendants in possession proceedings, duty scheme advisers and hopefully members of the judiciary who are unaware of the relevant court decisions and… [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 8:29 am
I hope you find the article below of interest. [read post]
17 Feb 2013, 3:17 pm
As it appears that Mr Gopee has on at least one occasion continued to pursue proceedings (including appearing in the appeal permission in the last post) for Barons Finance Limited, despite the company having been wound up and a liquidator having been appointed by the Court, we hope this post might be of use for people acting for Defendants in possession proceedings, duty scheme advisers and hopefully members of the judiciary who are unaware of the relevant court decisions and… [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:36 am
… and then Darren takes the floor for a more in-depth analysis.* Canary Wharf: great place name, not much hope for a trade mark ...Jeremy writes upCanary Wharf Group Ltd v Comptroller General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks [2015] EWHC 1588 (Ch), a Chancery Division, England and Wales, decision with a history, and a curious trade mark tale too.* A novel becomes a saga - Actavis v Lilly set to go on and onThe IPKat blogged last year about the… [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 5:40 am
The authors think that Goh JC’s views are sound, and hope to see them endorsed in the future. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 4:32 pm
In Bridge v. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 10:45 am
The 9th Circuit opinion from Fung that we hope to post about soon is another example. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 9:00 am
Nixon case, or Registered Sex Offenders v. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 8:42 pm
Here’s hoping Cartoon Network fares better than that case did. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 11:26 am
The case is Ford Motor Co. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 8:17 am
In U.S. disability history, Halderman v. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 6:54 am
One such case is Bailey v. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 2:43 pm
In EEOC v. [read post]
