Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)"
Results 5621 - 5640
of 21,107
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2019, 7:55 am
The court first rejected the plaintiff’s argument that the defendants should be held liable for publishing the content of scam locksmith websites because they were “on actual notice” that this content was fraudulent, concluding that liability for such posting of third-party content is “plainly” barred by the CDA: (“[I]t is “well established that notice of the unlawful nature of the information provided is not enough to make it the… [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 4:17 pm
Information “likely to harm Australia’s interests” is not defined. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 3:09 pm
The policy’s “invasion of privacy” exclusion provides that: “The Insurer shall not be liable under Insuring Clause C for Loss on account of any Claim made against the Company … based upon, arising out of, attributable to and actual or alleged … invasion of privacy. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 1:23 pm
Further, if there is a potential that imports will imminently exceed the 3 percent or 7 percent thresholds, such imports will not be deemed negligible for purposes of the USITC’s threat determination. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 10:53 am
The plaintiff alleged the defendant was strictly liable for her injuries as the dog’s owner pursuant to RCW 16.08.040. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 10:53 am
The defendants filed a motion for summary judgment, on the grounds that each defendant was entitled to immunity. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 6:14 am
The Supreme Court has ruled that a documentary filmmaker cannot sue a community access organization under the First Amendment, determining that the defendant is not a governmental actor and therefore cannot be held liable for any constitutional violation.The case is Manhattan Community Access Corp. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 3:11 pm
Hawley Has a Bill That Could Put the KKK in Your Newsfeed This bill effectively prevents platforms from removing any political content, since that could make them liable for lawsuits over any user’s posting. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 2:58 pm
Partridge filed a claim against the state seeking damages for defamation for being wrongfully branded a sexual predator and on October 4, 2013, the Court of Claims found that the defendant was 100% liable for the defamation of Mr. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 12:45 pm
If another site embeds that content into their own page, they are not liable. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 10:28 am
Of course, the defendant will likely deny that it should be held liable for the plaintiff’s slip and fall accident, pointing the finger back at the plaintiff for the accident or denying that the dangerous condition described by the plaintiff even existed. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 6:31 am
If you are injured in an accident in Massachusetts, call the Law Offices of Jeffrey S. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 4:43 am
Punitive damages are damages that are intended to punish the defendant as a means of dissuading others from doing the same thing. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 4:43 am
Punitive damages are damages that are intended to punish the defendant as a means of dissuading others from doing the same thing. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 1:32 pm
The other four indictments are unlikely to go forward because the defendants have left the country. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 1:25 pm
Vylah Tech LLC, the court found Vylah Tech, a small tech company, liable for disseminating false and misleading information regarding its computers. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 11:09 am
After hearing Hensel Phelp’s evidence and the total lack of defenses from Perdomo and Surety, the panel issued an award in favor of Hensel Phelps, finding Perdomo LLC in default and holding Perdomo LLC and Allied World jointly and severally liable in the amount of $2,958,209.71 and Perdomo LLC individually liable in the amount of $7,917,666.30 plus interest. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 8:20 am
The defendant Tor Project is a Massachusetts non-profit organization responsible for maintaining the software underlying the Tor browser. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 7:01 am
However, if the defendant breached the duty of care it owes to individuals or was otherwise guilty of wrongdoing, the defendant may be liable for the person’s damages. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 4:28 am
Jarmuth’s first cause of action for legal malpractice is dismissed without prejudice. [read post]
