Search for: "Line v. Line"
Results 5621 - 5640
of 45,548
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2011, 8:58 am
Decision 14,373Sometimes it may be difficult to determine the location of that thin line that separates lawful constructive criticism of an individual’s performance by a supervisor and supervisory actions addressing an individual’s performance that are disciplinary in nature.As the Court of Appeals indicated in Holt v Webutick Central School District, 52 NY2d 625, a counseling memorandum that is given to an employee and placed in his or her personnel file constitutes a… [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 2:27 pm
(See Batuyong v. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 12:29 pm
The Texas Supreme Court recently issued its decision in Nettye Engler Energy L.P. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 9:00 pm
” As established in Page v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 12:31 pm
Chartis Specialty Lines Ins. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 4:32 am
New Line Productions, Inc., 35 F. [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 3:22 am
And imagined the wry smile on Justice Klein's face as she penned this line. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 7:47 pm
But the drama wasn't there as much.Judge Wardlaw ends the week with a case that probably falls along those same lines. [read post]
26 Jul 2009, 4:00 am
The line up above played well against Honduras and I don't see any reason to make changes. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 4:02 pm
Even if you don't cross state lines. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 2:42 pm
Here's what you should not leave sitting in plain view during one of these inspections: "On the bar in the kitchen area . . . two lines of cocaine cut for use and two rolled dollar bills [and] another line of cocaine and a rolled bill in a bedroom. . . . [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 12:25 pm
Lines like: "We are mindful that our request adds to the demanding caseload of the California Supreme Court, but this case raises difficult questions of California law on which trial courts, both state and federal, are sharply divided. [read post]
26 May 2011, 11:03 am
But the Court of Appeal here says, nope, on this point, the statute is clear: You've got to have that line. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 6:30 am
(v) Expressions of concern about constitutionalism are often used as a ‘mask’ (p. 35) to conceal political disagreement with populist movements. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 12:18 pm
” In Pitre v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 10:04 am
S. 414, or Offshore Logistics, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 8:35 am
State v. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 5:31 pm
FRANCES V. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 6:21 am
And (for me) the issue of scandal is quite serious here: Others who see the orthodox Catholic judge affirming Roe v. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 1:23 pm
* * *As in the Senate, House lawmakers appear divided along party lines. [read post]
