Search for: "MARSHALL v. MARSHALL" Results 5621 - 5640 of 6,382
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2009, 7:38 am
[v] To ensure compliance with applicable laws and regulations, contractor personnel should obtain legal review, prior to release or publication, of any promotional or advertising materials that contain content related to federal entities. [read post]
11 May 2009, 10:32 am
Even when the best stuff you can find to support your view are isolated sentences from a concurring opinion by Justice Marshall and a dissent from a denial by White. [read post]
10 May 2009, 12:27 pm
’) At trial before HHJ Marshall, the judge upheld the defence of surrender, holding that the lease was surrendered in early June and before the next quarter’s rent was due. [read post]
6 May 2009, 11:24 am
For example, Jackson, dissenting in Korematsu v. [read post]
3 May 2009, 2:31 pm
by Paul BlandI've gotten caught up in scores of e-mails and requests from angry lawyers asking "what can I do about the ABA getting hijacked? [read post]
3 May 2009, 11:29 am
His simple dissent two years ago in Bowles v. [read post]
1 May 2009, 10:00 am
(Creative Commons) Copyright Office hearing on proposed exemptions to DMCA ban on DRM circumvention (EFF) (Ars Technica) Open educational resources and implementation of the US Recovery Act (Creative Commons) Twitter and the DMCA: A fine mess (The Trademark Blog)   US Copyright – Lawsuits and strategic steps Apple – Apple sued by BluWiki operator OdioWorks, seeking declaratory judgment that its postings do not violate DMCA (Ars Technica) (EFF) Google – District… [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 12:45 am
The head of the Manhattan DA's elder abuse unit said Marshall and lawyer Francis X. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 2:39 pm
As I wrote a few days ago, it's been a busy couple of weeks for the court in Marshall, where Judge Everingham has been trying a case downstairs and Judge Ward upstairs,  First across the finish line was Opti v. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 11:37 am
Or, to put it as Judge Consuelo Marshall does (sitting by designation), if you're "an opinionated and arrogant" host of a radio show, you're harder to sue for defamation than someone who's actually reasonable.To put it another way, the more you defame everyone, the harder it is for any particular person to sue you for defamation. [read post]