Search for: "Matter of Mark T."
Results 5621 - 5640
of 16,583
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2016, 10:44 am
” VSL argued that the use of the safe harbor statements on the Visbiome website was excessive and the disclaimer wasn’t close enough to the use of the mark. [read post]
8 Sep 2012, 4:26 am
Because they never mattered. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 11:04 pm
As we have discussed before, look-for advertising is a powerful tool in developing non-traditional trademark rights in subject matter such as single color marks. [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 2:46 pm
That said, I hope they find their jobs, and 550 applicants for 270 jobs isn't all that terrible. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 4:31 am
"The issue related to the history paper mark scheme is one of those cases, and our investigation of this matter is moving forward but has not yet been completed. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 7:54 am
It isn’t right, but it isn’t surprising. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 8:34 am
Judge Newman wrote in dissent that "the court has misunderstood the law of 'anticipation' and has misapplied the rules of claim construction … [i]t is incorrect to construe a claim so as to delete limitations stated in the claim - including the 'preamble' clause - and then to hold the claim 'anticipated' by subject matter that is excluded by the limitations stated in the preamble clause. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 6:15 pm
Copyright © 2010 Mark Bennett. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 6:00 am
It doesn’t matter which order these elements are available, but you need at least three to succeed. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 11:58 am
The plaintiff later testified that he parked there because he was driving a 22-foot-long crew cab truck that wouldn’t fit in the marked spots. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 6:07 am
What matters most is that Tan is not likely making enough money to justify defending his acts. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 1:58 pm
That means that someone could click 3 times on your ad using different computers and end up costing you over $20 in a matter of seconds! [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 9:41 am
§1052(a), including not just potentially disparaging marks but also those that could fall under another clause of §1052(a) prohibiting a trademark that “[c]onsists of or comprises immoral, deceptive, or scandalous matter. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 11:28 am
Brand loyalty and price-tag importance has fallen by the wayside as pure originality and exclusive design have become the mark of a true sneaker aficionado. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 12:23 pm
PRACTICAL TIP: It doesn’t matter whether you are a prime contractor, a specialty subcontractor, or a material supplier, you should thoroughly investigate the other party’s credit worthiness BEFORE you sign the contract. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 12:23 pm
PRACTICAL TIP: It doesn’t matter whether you are a prime contractor, a specialty subcontractor, or a material supplier, you should thoroughly investigate the other party’s credit worthiness BEFORE you sign the contract. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 12:23 pm
PRACTICAL TIP: It doesn’t matter whether you are a prime contractor, a specialty subcontractor, or a material supplier, you should thoroughly investigate the other party’s credit worthiness BEFORE you sign the contract. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 12:23 pm
PRACTICAL TIP: It doesn’t matter whether you are a prime contractor, a specialty subcontractor, or a material supplier, you should thoroughly investigate the other party’s credit worthiness BEFORE you sign the contract. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 11:26 pm
One can't patent "scientific understanding" of that which already was being done. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 12:23 pm
PRACTICAL TIP: It doesn’t matter whether you are a prime contractor, a specialty subcontractor, or a material supplier, you should thoroughly investigate the other party’s credit worthiness BEFORE you sign the contract. [read post]
