Search for: "People v J." Results 5621 - 5640 of 7,246
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Dec 2010, 8:00 am by Kent Scheidegger
Illinois, 504 U.S. 719, 751 (1992) (Scalia, J., dissenting), and Justice Stevens' role in creating it. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 9:19 am by J
I’m rather surprised that Cranson J didn’t say a bit more about that. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 9:16 am by Roshonda Scipio
(David Andrew), 1958-New York : Oxford University Press, 2011-Constitutional LawKF4541 .M278 2010Ratification : the people debate the Constitution, 1787-1788 / Pauline Maier.Maier, Pauline, 1938-New York : Simon & Schuster, 2010.Criminal LawK5018 .L38 2010The limits of criminal law : a comparative analysis of approaches to legal theorizing / Carl Constantin Lauterwein.Lauterwein, Carl Constantin.Burlington, VT : Ashgate, c2010.Criminal ProcedureKF9630 .C75 2010Criminal procedure and the… [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 6:41 am by Brian Shiffrin
People v Black (_ NY3d_, 2010 NY Slip Op 08766 [11/3010]) is one of the four cases with Batson issues that the Court considered in People v Hecker. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 4:22 pm by INFORRM
For example, in the case involving a photograph of J K Rowling’s child taken in the street, Patten J said “if the law is such as to give every adult or child a legitimate expectation of not being photographed without consent on any occasion on which they are not, so to speak, on public business then it will have created a right for most people to the protection of their image” (see Murray v Big Pictures [2007] EWHC 1908 (Ch), [65]). [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 11:50 am by Rumpole
However, courtesy of the SCOTUS Blog, there's this "kinda-sorta" exception announced in Abbott v. [read post]
27 Nov 2010, 7:35 am by Andres
The case is that of Newspaper Licensing Agency Ltd v Meltwater Holding BV [2010] EWHC 3099 (Ch). [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 12:49 am by Caroline Cross
X and Y brought a claim for damages against the local authority under negligence and section 7 HRA 1998 (X and Y v Hounslow LBC [2008] EWHC 1168 (QB)). [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 2:01 am by INFORRM
For example, in Ecclestone v Telegraph Media Group Ltd [2009] EWHC 2779 (QB) (Sharp J), the alleged libel was a diary item in the Telegraph which quoted the claimant as saying that she was not a “veggie” and did not “have much time” for people like the McCartneys and Annie Lennox. [read post]