Search for: "Reach v. State" Results 5621 - 5640 of 36,411
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2008, 6:35 am by Thomas Swartz
It is somewhat common in divorces for the parties to reach an agreement regarding spousal support. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 6:35 am by Thomas Swartz
It is somewhat common in divorces for the parties to reach an agreement regarding spousal support. [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 12:39 am
Instead, its stated reasons were cursory and often at odds with EPA’s own prior assumptions and statements. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 4:59 pm
 Not a barrier to class certification.Judge Friedland reaches this same conclusion using words and concepts that are a bit more articulate.But to the same end. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 12:26 am by Graeme Hall
In the courts: Duncombe & Ors v Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families [2011] UKSC 14 (30 March 2011): Supreme Court: Teachers employed by Sec of State to work abroad at European Schools entitled to the protection against unfair dismissal – see the Education Law Blog. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
Tugendhat J was therefore bound by the Court of Appeal’s decision in Secretary of State for Trade and Industry v Bairstow [2003] EWCA Viv 321; [2004] Ch 1. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 12:16 pm by Derek T. Muller
Husted (2016): application for stay October 25, 2016; denied October 31, 2016Arizona Secretary of State’s Office v. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 1:18 pm
In a recent decision from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington, Olsen v. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 5:44 pm by INFORRM
As part of our annual review of defamation law in the jurisdiction, we examine two notable reported judgments from 2021 and, as the Northern Ireland Assembly’s legislative programme reaches the final stages, the nature of the reforms proposed by the Defamation Bill. 2021 Cases: MacAirt and Others v JPI Media NI and Foster v Jessen Two reported judgments stood out in 2021. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:30 am by Jeremy Tyler
While the standards for expert witness testimony may differ between state and federal courts, all federal courts are bound by Federal Rule of Evidence 702 and the United States Supreme Court’s decisions in Daubert v. [read post]