Search for: "Samsung" Results 5621 - 5640 of 6,717
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jan 2017, 6:28 am
Schmitt, supra(citation and quotation marks omitted).Lewisbey argues that the Facebook posts and the text messages taken from two phones—a Samsung and an iPhone—should have been excluded on both hearsay and authentication grounds. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 6:55 pm by Florian Mueller
She also heard today from former Qualcomm president Derek "Duct Tape" Aberle that Intel, Broadcom, MediaTek, Samsung, and Huawei had asked for exhaustive chipset-level SEP licenses from Qualcomm. [read post]
22 May 2016, 7:17 am by Florian Mueller
First, Java was in use on a huge number of mobile devices (BlackBerry, Nokia, Samsung etc.) before Android. [read post]
14 Oct 2022, 5:16 am by Chenny Zhang
Now, two of its CDMOs, Celltrion and Samsung Biologics, are among the largest in the world. [read post]
7 Nov 2012, 3:54 am by Rob Robinson
Chase LLC -  http://bit.ly/SSv96a (Todd Ohlms, Joseph Fogel) Failing to Preserve:  Apple, Samsung Narrowly Escape Adverse Inference Instruction - http://bit.ly/RuTGtt (Michael Kozubek) Five Questions with Ralph Losey about the New eDiscovery Best Practices (EDBP) Model for Attorneys – http://bit.ly/SXuNJ4 (Dean Gonsowski) Five Reasons to Outsource Litigation Support - http://bit.ly/StFgvy (Ralph Losey) How to Preserve Data When You Can’t… [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 11:38 pm by Florian Mueller
Years ago, Samsung dropped its European SEP injunction requests because of pressure from the EU Commission. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 12:51 am by Florian Mueller
Late on Thursday by local California time, Oracle and Google filed a joint status report (though the order had not explicitly required them to file jointly). [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 12:07 pm by Florian Mueller
Maybe this will change, but antitrust authorities generally tend to leave royalty determinations -- including unreasonableness determinations -- to arbitration tribunals and courts.Injunctions and excessive royalty demands (which companies like Samsung and Motorola make in order to have an excuse for the pursuit of injunctions) both harm competition and innovation, and consumers ultimately suffer from both types of conduct. [read post]
11 Feb 2017, 7:09 am by Rebecca Tushnet
If we’re reading old cases wrong, may be reading them wrong as to this too.McKenna: does Apple/Samsung lock us in b/c the Ct has said that the article of manufacture can be a component—makes it no longer sensible to talk about partial design if whatever is claimed is the design.A: not sure that’s what the Ct did. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 7:50 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Q: concern would be that if someone searches on Samsung, then goes to buy some other phone elsewhere, then back to Samsung to buy an accessory/peripheral. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 8:38 am by Keith Mallinson
  In a series of cases it has investigated a variety of potential competition law issues arising from the FRAND commitment, including allegations of patent ambush in Rambus, the transfer of FRAND commitments in IPCom, the risk of supposed “hold up” resulting from SEP holders seeking injunctive relief in Samsung, and in Motorola, here, and here. [read post]
28 May 2024, 1:31 am by Keith Mallinson
In comparison to Apple and Samsung, most handset OEMs are in a rather more commoditized (i.e. less product-differentiated) and price-competitive market segment. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 2:10 am by Florian Mueller
So what I wrote a couple of days ago about how even the #1 Apple fanboy among U.S. judges (not Judge Koh; she's just the worst pro-weak-patent activist out there, definitely worse than her frequently-criticized colleagues in the Eastern District of Texas) has lost his faith in some of Apple's patents-in-suit against Samsung is not really relevant to what I think of Apple's overall outlook.My disagreement with Apple on its choice of a license for Swift also wasn't a key… [read post]
6 Jan 2013, 10:37 am by Sai Vinod
This new year Barry Sookman announced the most popular intellectual property and technology blogs. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
Becton Dickinson (EDTexweblog.com) District Court E D New York: Federal police power trumps patent law: IRIS Corporation v Japan Airlines (IP Frontline) Delaware Court: Honeywell patents on LCDs nixed: court dismisses claim of patent infringement: Honeywell v Fujifilm and Samsung (Managing IP) District Court W D of Wisconsin denies motion claim for claim construction in full: Semiconductor Energy Lab Co v Samsung Elecs. [read post]
9 May 2007, 3:10 pm
According to a complaint Samsung filed with the U.S. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 6:50 am by Dennis Crouch
Design Patent Damages: Oral arguments were held earlier this week in Samsung v. [read post]