Search for: "Short v. United States"
Results 5621 - 5640
of 10,139
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2011, 2:10 pm
In a challenge to that action, County of Rockland, New York, et al. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 12:40 pm
United States dated September 27, 2011. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 4:00 am
Developments in the U.S. since Roe v. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 11:18 am
Circuit released its opinion in Al Bihani v. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 7:56 am
United States, the court resolved an issue of keen interest to a limited niche of immigrants. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 10:26 am
As a legal matter, the short answer is almost certainly yes. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 12:53 pm
United States, 370 U.S. 294, 325 (1962) (elasticity of demand). [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 10:25 pm
"] Enough about the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
1 Apr 2022, 4:00 am
" Here's the key language from the article:In the 1968 case of United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 9:01 pm
Two years later, the Court followed this up in Pierce v. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 3:29 pm
That case, Rapanos v. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 12:05 pm
" PICCO, 411 U.S. at 674; United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 6:12 am
United States, a "closely watched federal tax case involving the scope of the work-product doctrine. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 10:58 am
For example, for litigants bringing cases in United States Federal Districts Courts, the pleading standard requires that the complaint must set forth at least “enough facts to state a claim for relief that is plausible on its face. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 8:57 am
So it sets up (another) potentially difficult cross-border legal conundrum: if I’m sued in Austria because something I post here on the VC allegedly infringes an Austrian resident’s copyright, and a judgment is issued against me in an Austrian court (which has held that it can properly assert jurisdiction over me on the basis of EU law), can that judgment be enforced in the United States against me? [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 5:30 pm
Accord Phelps v. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 7:59 am
" State ex rel. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 2:40 pm
State v. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 7:43 am
Of last week’s 16 relists, the court dumped nearly half, including United States Forest Service v. [read post]
4 Dec 2010, 8:00 am
The short answer is that our government is more democratic than theirs, but Garland manages to spin that in ways that make it sound like democracy is a bad thing. [read post]
