Search for: "State Bank v. United States" Results 5621 - 5640 of 7,411
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2020, 4:11 am by James Romoser
At the Second Thoughts Blog from the Duke Center for Firearms Law, Daniel Rice examines the court’s “void for vagueness” doctrine and how it might relate to the Second Amendment, drawing on Justice Clarence Thomas’ concurrence in United States v. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 12:58 pm by rhall@initiativelegal.com
Brinker Affirms Continued Vitality of Wage and Hour Class Actions Oil refinery workers and ConocoPhillips Co. settled meal break claims for $15 million in United Steelworkers v. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 10:39 am by Peter D. Hardy and James Mangiaracina
  If ultimately enacted as law, even a scaled-back version of this amendment could significantly alter the Bank Secrecy Act/Anti-Money Laundering (“BSA/AML”) regulatory framework in the United States. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 12:28 am
These comments specifically stated that the Devils River Unit should be excluded because the benefits of doing so outweighed the benefits of inclusion. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 9:40 am by Roy Black
  UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS Criminal Action No. 20-10177-PBS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 9:07 pm by Gene Takagi
There have been a few cases involving charities and purported support of terrorist organizations, including United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 4:08 pm
Stiftelsen SINTEF (EPLAW)   Poland Voivodeship Administrative Court: Design, freedom and Polish law: VI SA / Wa 518/09 (Class 99)   Saudi Arabia Saudi Arabia looking into setting up special IP courts (IP Factor)   South Africa Western Cape High Court finds in favour of Trimega, grants interim interdict preventing Real World Diagnostics from using IP related to drink-driving breathalysers (Afro-IP) (Afro-IP)   United Kingdom Civil Law Reform Bill: latest news (PatLit) UK… [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 9:35 am
The European Union and the United States voted against the resolution, which they thought counter-productive and polarizing; both stated that they would not participate in the treaty negotiating process.[5] Japan and South Korea also voted no. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 3:03 pm by Eugene Volokh
The law of some states seems to reject this theory, see, e.g., Fashion Boutique of Short Hills, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 4:35 am by Edith Roberts
Arab Bank that corporations are not liable under the Alien Tort Statute, we will have “corporations that are empowered to spend in American elections because of Bellotti and Citizens United; corporations that can make religious objections thanks to Hobby Lobby; and … corporations [that] will be able to aid and abet human rights violations abroad with impunity. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 6:08 am
Even knowing falsehoods about large groups likely protected, too: Given United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 9:30 pm by Justin Daniel
Department of Justice (DOJ) asking the Court to rehear U.S. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 2:07 pm by David Kopel
Cooley, General Principles of Constitutional Law 271 (2d ed. 1891) (discussing the implicit right to train with weapons)); United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 10:48 pm by Chukwuma Okoli
Ltd v Union Bank (2015) LPELR-26010(CA) 32-36 highlights his commitment to addressing conflict of laws situations even when the majority view falls short. [read post]