Search for: "State of California v. United States" Results 5621 - 5640 of 13,841
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2021, 1:32 am by Florian Mueller
, I thought I was done with that topic until the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit orders the fairly likely stay of the injunction. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 8:30 am by Underwood Law Firm, P.C.
The Marketable Record Title Act is a piece of legislation adopted by many states in the United States with the aim of clarifying and simplifying real property titles. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 10:00 am by Ray Dowd
  I quote:“[A]ny civil action brought in a State court of which the district courts of the United States have original jurisdiction, may be removed by the defendant or the defendants, to the district court of the United States. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 6:33 pm by Pamela Wolf
In United States v Windsor (Dkt No 12-307), the petitioner contends that DOMA has denied gays and lesbians who have been allowed to marry lawfully in certain states all of the benefits and protections that married couples enjoy under federal law. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 5:12 pm by Irene C. Olszewski, Esq.
Golinski is employed as staff attorney in the Motions Unit of the Office of Staff Attorneys in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 1:38 pm by Jarod Bona
Johns River Management District In 2013, the Supreme Court enhanced property rights in the United States when it decided Koontz. [read post]
10 Oct 2024, 5:12 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Excerpted from: Complex Employment Issues for California Workers' Compensation (284-page special supplement to Rassp & Herlick, California Workers’ Compensation Law). [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 9:06 pm by Dan Flynn
The federal case of The Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) v. [read post]
16 May 2007, 3:24 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled yesterday in Fair Housing Council of San Fernando Valley, et al v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 4:25 am by Heidi Henson
The NLRB lacked a quorum of board members when it published its rule amending its representation election procedures on December 16, 2011, and the challenged rule is therefore invalid, the District of Columbia federal district court held, in a perhaps tepid — and temporary — victory for opponents of what has been dubbed the board’s “quickie” or “ambush” election rule (Chamber of Commerce of the United States v NLRB, May 14, 2012,… [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 8:37 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
As Douglas J., dissenting in United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 9:01 pm
As the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California aptly explained in United States of America v. [read post]