Search for: "State v. Childs"
Results 5621 - 5640
of 21,041
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Dec 2014, 5:42 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Criminal Opinions Body: SC19197 - State v. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 10:56 am
The Court of Appeals upholds the law and dismisses the case.The case is Phillips v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 10:15 pm
It is true that the CRC at Article 37(a) requires that states parties ensure that:No child shall be subjected to torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. [read post]
26 May 2011, 7:27 am
The Court can review a case at the behest of the government employee who lost on the merits but won on qualified immunity, but this case is moot.United States v. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 5:53 am
AC34385 - State v. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 5:47 pm
Until it does, I believe that the existing case law holding that an abatement of an existing child support order is not warranted due to incarceration of one of the parties, see Ross v. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 7:57 am
State v. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 2:20 pm
Washburn (Indian Child Welfare Act)Sisseton-Washington Oyate of the Lake Traverse Reservation v. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 8:21 am
Roan v. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 9:52 pm
Over at The WSJ Law Blog, there's a nice profile of Richard Diaz, the Florida solo who represents Michael Williams, a defendant who is challenging the constitutionality of a federal child-pornography statute in United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2019, 11:09 am
Teller v. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 1:08 pm
California state law does not permit recovery by a child for loss of consortium. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 9:19 pm
In Emma McPeek et al v. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 11:29 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Al-Jedda v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWCA Civ 212 (12 March 2010) High Court (Chancery Division) Johnson Machine and Tool Co Ltd & Anor, Re [2010] EWHC 582 (Ch) (18 March 2010) National Westminster Bank Plc v Rushmer & Anor [2010] EWHC 554 (Ch) (19 March 2010) High Court (Family Division) S (A Child) [2010] EWHC B2 (Fam) (3 March 2010) High Court (Commercial Court) Deutsche Bank Ag v Vik… [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 8:23 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 10:59 am
On Wednesday, November 3, 2009, the Michigan Supreme Court denied one application for leave to appeal, denied one motion for reconsideration, granted leave to the State Bar of Michigan and the Michigan Defense Trial Counsel to file briefs amicus curiae in Pellegrino v. [read post]
31 Jan 2009, 8:59 am
This statute regulated the content of the speech, the Constitution prohibits such regulation, and Appellant wasn't required to object to the constitutionaly of the statute in the trial court.I think the State's distinction seems to work when you're talking about virtual child porn because the specific intent is to communicate child porn. [read post]
22 May 2012, 3:13 pm
Further, this exception does not resolve the central issue that this bill unconstitutionally places limits on abortion in the same way that the United States Supreme Court struck down such limits in Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 5:05 am
" The court recognized that there was no Georgia case law on point, but cited to United States v. [read post]
