Search for: "State v. Keis" Results 5621 - 5640 of 22,498
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Oct 2006, 6:50 am
The key word here, however, is "can. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Courts have often expressed—as the Supreme Court did in United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 6:26 pm
Supreme court case of Caulder -v- Bull 3 U.S. 386 (1798) which states:"I will state what laws I consider ex post facto laws, within the words and the intent of the prohibition. 1st. [read post]
25 Feb 2018, 11:45 am
  The courts have stated that this is a "key factor" in determining whether an agreement results in a transfer of ownership (Apex Eyewear v Miracle Optics (2006)). [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
In this setting, states and cities argue that the anti-commandeering principle prevents the feds from requiring state and local authorities to affirmatively provide information about or access to individuals who may have committed immigration law violations.Perhaps the most important Supreme Court case on this point is Printz v. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 4:45 pm by Lawrence Solum
Wade for one key reason: we live in a surveillance state. [read post]