Search for: "State v. Plan"
Results 5621 - 5640
of 29,601
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2016, 6:50 am
THE RECENT 9TH CIRCUIT BAP OPINION OFADINOLFI v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 11:00 pm
According to a study released on May 25, 2020 by the Williams Institute on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law at UCLA , same-sex weddings have generated $3.8 billion in local and state economic activity in the United States since the Supreme Court legalized gay marriage five years ago this month in Obergefell v. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 4:06 pm
In Kaur v. [read post]
21 May 2008, 1:43 pm
" This ruling in State v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 3:45 pm
He asserted that the instruction was erroneous because the State did not seek to use the uncharged misconduct as evidence of motive or plan. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 7:18 pm
State of Tennessee v. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 9:59 am
Two key elements in MassHealth planning are that the property not be reachable by a creditor (such as the state MassHealth program), either (1) during the client’s lifetime or (2) after the client’s death. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 8:40 pm
” Coker v. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 9:48 am
State ex rel. 14th Dist. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 3:30 pm
In Hogg v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 6:05 pm
Employee Welfare Benefit Plan & Trust, 50 F.3d 1478, 1483 (9th Cir. 1995) (citing Amato v. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 7:53 am
In October, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in a case alleging that Wisconsin’s Republican-controlled legislature had drawn the state’s redistricting plan to put Democrats at a disadvantage – a claim known as “partisan gerrymandering. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 1:18 am
Tunis reversed edition.The big case that made the paper was Arias v. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 12:17 pm
Shaffer v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 1:15 pm
In Gaito v. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 8:11 am
The US Supreme Court on Wednesday heard oral arguments in the case Acheson Hotels, LLC v. [read post]
21 May 2023, 3:39 pm
On May 17, 2020, the California Supreme Court granted review of the First District Court of Appeal’s controversial and much criticized published decision in Make UC a Good Neighbor v. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 7:41 am
Once adopted, the proposed rule will replace the 2005 Clean Air Interstate Rule (“CAIR”), which required states to develop State Implementation Plans (“SIPs”) to address interstate transport of SO2 and NOx.[2] CAIR allowed states to opt into a voluntary cap-and-trade program.[3] In a 2008 decision and subsequent decision on rehearing,[4] the D.C. [read post]
22 Aug 2007, 6:58 am
Janine Cox won in State v. [read post]
4 Oct 2012, 9:45 pm
ABILENE DIAGNOSTIC v. [read post]
