Search for: "State v. Save"
Results 5621 - 5640
of 11,763
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2014, 3:41 pm
Nor had the Supreme Court yet ruled in United State v. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 11:24 am
If a dispute arises, a well-drafted contract will anticipate such a dispute and could save you thousands of dollars in legal fees later on. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 3:00 pm
In the case, Trigg v. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 7:00 am
Shavers and Bitcoin Savings and TrustCase number: 13-cv-00416 (United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas)Case filed: July 23, 2013Qualifying Judgment/Order: September 18, 2014 10/23/2014 01/21/2015 2014-106 SEC v. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 9:11 am
United States, 14-5227, and Freidus v. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 8:10 am
In United States v. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 4:17 pm
" Further, particularly relevant to this case, the statute clearly states that the use of another's credit, not merely the receipt of tangible goods, is punishable under the statute. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 1:38 pm
Highlights include the following:The elective deferral (contribution) limit for employees who participate in 401(k), 403(b), most 457 plans, and the federal government’s Thrift Savings Plan is increased from $17,500 to $18,000.The catch-up contribution limit for employees aged 50 and over who participate in 401(k), 403(b), most 457 plans, and the federal government’s Thrift Savings Plan is increased from $5,500 to $6,000.The limit on annual contributions to… [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 11:52 am
Abigail Alliance for Better Access to Developmental Drugs v. von Eschenbach, 495 F.3d 695, 710-11 (D.C. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 10:41 am
The majority concluded that, under Feiner v. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 3:45 pm
(Finally) AA v London Borough of Southwark [2014] EWHC 500 (QB) This High Court judgment is remarkable in many ways, most of them worrying. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 5:01 am
Music v. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 6:59 am
The recent case of Royal Caribbean v. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 6:03 am
The dispute substantially concerns the question of whether the use of a pair of coloured overlapping ovals with a distinctive word element can save a sign constituted of two black overlapping ovals without any word sign from non-use revocation. [read post]
18 Oct 2014, 7:34 am
Dynamex v. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 5:02 pm
In a recent case, Cochran v. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 5:02 pm
In a recent case, Cochran v. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 6:55 am
The UK Intellectual Property Office has stated that this amendment will help to save costs on copyright clearance, support free expression and align UK law with the rest of Europe. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 4:35 pm
City and County of San Francisco (2013) 222 Cal.App.4th 863 and Save the Plastic Bag Coalition v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 11:19 am
All of his checking and savings accounts are in Florida banks. [read post]
