Search for: "State v. So " Results 5621 - 5640 of 116,384
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2016, 8:44 am
 Judge Murguia, joined by Judge Fisher, says that the last reasoned state court decision in this habeas case assumed arguendo that Juror No. 2 was credible, so there needs to be an evidentiary hearing about prejudice and other fact-finding. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 2:35 pm by Will Baude
Mississippi, 292 U.S. 313 (1934), and Article I likewise declines to grant Congress an enumerated power to do so, see Seminole Tribe of Fla. v. [read post]
24 Nov 2011, 7:51 am by Stephanie Smith, Arden Chambers.
Applying Stack and Oxley v Hiscock [2004] EWCA Civ 546, the judge at first instance accepted this contention, stating that he had to consider what was just and fair between the parties having regard to the whole course of dealing between them. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 7:29 am by Stephen D. Rosenberg
Why this is working in this way is perfectly summed up in this decision out of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Curtis v. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 8:07 am by Jane Chong
” Similarly, in United States v. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 4:02 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Props., LLC v Penske Truck Leasing Co., L.P., 195 AD3d 1502, 1502-1503; Mazzurco v PII Sam, LLC, 153 AD3d 1341, 1342; Desiderio v Geico Gen. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 8:25 am
Part V reviews the state ratification debates about the 1787 Constitution and introduces the religious freedom amendments that they proposed to the First Congress tasked with drafting new federal rights language. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 8:25 am by Christine Corcos
Part V reviews the state ratification debates about the 1787 Constitution and introduces the religious freedom amendments that they proposed to the First Congress tasked with drafting new federal rights language. [read post]
13 Jun 2009, 10:10 am
The panel decision in the case, issued on April 28, deepened a split among federal appeals courts on the scope of the so-called “state secrets privilege. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 4:46 am by Amy Howe
Wheeler, arguing that “[t]he fact that it is necessary for the high court to so admonish the federal appellate courts is a sad commentary on the state of our judiciary. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 7:10 am by Burton A. Padove
She stated she counseled him to maximize his retirement benefits, and therefore she should be entitled to half of the $1.2 million. [read post]