Search for: "State v. Stephens." Results 5621 - 5640 of 7,112
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Feb 2011, 9:31 am
The Department of Justice recused itself, and independent attorney Stephen McAllister was brought in from Topeka, Kansas, to defend the case in the government's place.)The 28-word Tenth Amendment reads: "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 7:24 pm by Marc DeGirolami
  The latter was the older rule in a case from the early 1980s, People v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 1:44 pm by Lyle Denniston
  Appointed by the Court to defend the lower court ruling, when the Justice Department would not, will be Stephen R. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 8:16 pm by Stephen Page
In other words: evidence of lies in the proceedings, a costs order must be made.Justice Boland stated the approach to be taken on costs:The relevant provisions of the Act are s 117, s 117AB and s 117C. [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 10:40 pm by Stephen Page
That approach was adopted by Strickland J in Parker v Parker [2010] FamCA 664 (3 August 2010). [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 6:27 am by Ted Frank
The last few days have seen some fascinating discussion worth reading about the relationship between tort reform and federalism: William Jacobson, Stephen Bainbridge (citing a 2004 Volokh analysis), Ilya Somin @ Volokh. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 12:33 pm by scanner1
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 10-0282, 2011 MT 18, STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. [read post]
We
14 Feb 2011, 12:00 pm by Nicholas Moline
Palfrey, Harvard Law School; Stephen Schultze, Princeton University; and Christopher Wong, New York Law School. [read post]
We
14 Feb 2011, 12:00 pm by Nicholas Moline
Palfrey, Harvard Law School; Stephen Schultze, Princeton University; and Christopher Wong, New York Law School. [read post]