Search for: "Stephens v State"
Results 5621 - 5640
of 6,371
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 May 2015, 2:59 am
Taney also wrote the majority opinion in the controversial Dred Scott case in 1857, a decision than Lincoln publicly criticized in his famous debates with Stephen Douglas. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 10:24 am
It will be argued, however, that in accepting the inevitability of mandatory state-formulated rules within corporate law as an effective proxy for (unattainable) optimal contractual outcomes, contractarianism’s market-liberal logic strays beyond its own self-asserted boundary between (private) civil society and (public) state. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 9:59 am
Supreme Court, where the six-justice majority ruled in his favor in Kennedy v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 12:01 pm
Fisher for petitioners (Art Lien) The plaintiffs in Jesner v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 4:25 pm
And Landau soon was confronted with further skepticism, this time from Justice Stephen G. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 10:42 am
Justice Kavanaugh with opinion in Flowers v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 4:19 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 7:16 am
In 1985, in Smith v. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 12:59 pm
Stephen Turner of the United Kingdom, Professor Patrick Keyzer of Australia, Dr. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 6:07 pm
(Stanford University)Alexis Marcus (Northwestern University)Alvarez Fernando (University of Chicago)Andersen Torben (Northwestern University)Baliga Sandeep (Northwestern University)Banerjee Abhijit V. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 4:40 pm
In 2019, Stephen Thaler submitted a copyright application for his visual artwork, “A Recent Entrance to Paradise,” which stated that an AI computer algorithm, the “Creativity Machine,” created the artistic piece. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 2:37 pm
RT suggests possible further reading: Stephen M. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 6:30 am
” Professor Tushnet spends a good amount of time examining the deconstruction of the administrative state (pp. 147-163). [read post]
14 May 2015, 7:04 pm
Earlier this year in Yates v. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 7:23 am
Question: Based on your extensive research, do you think that Bob Woodward and Scott Armstrong’s major take-away points (beyond United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
– discussion of Washington Post article on Ismed’s efforts to promote follow-on biologics approval pathway: (Patent Baristas), (Patent Docs), US: Congressional fact-finding on follow-on biologics: (Patent Docs), US: David v Monsanto: Biotechnology patent ‘exhaustion’ after Quanta, Supreme Court petition: (Hal Wegner), US: Ulysses Pharmaceuticals announces issuance of patent for novel class of ant [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 4:52 pm
Agent G states in the Criminal Complaint that he reviewed a letter sent to A at her home, postmarked 20 October 2008, which stated in part: “I remember our past experiences together so fondly. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 1:00 pm
” Franklin Feldman & Stephen E. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 10:43 am
Berry v. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 11:16 am
United States and Obergefell v. [read post]
