Search for: "Test Plaintiff"
Results 5621 - 5640
of 21,970
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2019, 11:10 pm
The program, which began on March 19th 2019, will be tested for a three- year period. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 5:44 pm
The court agreed that the defendant would suffer extreme prejudice if the witness testified, as the defendant would not have the opportunity to test her credibility. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 5:17 pm
D.C., tests D.C.'s anti-obstruction... [read post]
6 Apr 2019, 2:33 pm
Ouellette (@PatentScholar) April 5, 2019Bernard Chao (@wsurferesq): In product mislabeling 3x3x2 test on mTurk, found evidence that salience & anchoring can lead to overcompensation. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 10:55 am
The first is called the “catalyst” test, which asks whether the plaintiff’s lawsuit was “a catalyst for [the] defendant’s voluntary change in conduct. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 9:54 am
Plaintiff hired a Railroad Expert Witness to provide testimony. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 6:58 am
Circuit’s four-factor entitlement test and concluding that CIA acted reasonably in response to plaintiff’s request. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 12:34 pm
Ct. 1744 (2014), district courts are to apply a “totality of the circumstances” test to determine whether a case is exceptional. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 11:21 am
” The plaintiffs dispute the legal significance of this history. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 6:27 am
” Thus, plaintiffs could prove typicality despite the variations in labels on the market. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 12:01 am
” Kind of seems like a religious test, frankly. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 6:59 am
According to the court, the complaint established that the virtual currency at issue was an “investment contract” under the test set forth in SEC v. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 6:55 am
Goodman).Genericness: The test for determining whether a proposed mark is generic is its primary significance to the relevant public. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 4:33 pm
Whether comment was sought from the plaintiff. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 3:03 pm
The court also held that the employment agreement satisfied the intrinsic fairness test in the § 144(a)(3) safe harbor. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 11:47 am
This ruling is hailed as a significant boost to plaintiffs’ rights and opens the door in Illinois for similar cases to proceed. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 9:13 am
After the defendants filed a motion to strike matter from the plaintiff’s pleading on the ground that it was “scandalous,” the trial court struck approximately 15 paragraphs of the plaintiff’s complaint. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 8:22 am
” [The court noted that the journal study seemed to test two lots, not two bottles, but that didn’t matter.] [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 8:21 am
When the plaintiff doesn’t show the defendant benefited from the false advertising, disgorgement isn’t allowed even if the rest of the test favors disgorgement. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 7:05 am
But the court dismissed the plaintiff's Title IX claim. [read post]
