Search for: "United States v. David"
Results 5621 - 5640
of 6,869
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2015, 4:04 pm
United States A Washington D.C based band is suing YouTube, after the website removed its music video. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper patent to… [read post]
21 Jul 2019, 4:03 pm
United States Google is expected to pay a multimillion dollar penalty from the Federal Trade Commission over its handling of kids’ information on its popular video site YouTube. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 6:00 am
The Constitution states that members of Congress—along with every state legislative official and every judicial and executive official of both the state and federal governments—“shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 2:56 am
United States On 15 March 2023, the Colorado Attorney General’s Office finalised the rules implementing the Colorado Privacy Act. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 2:43 pm
Most recently, in Wal-Mart v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 2:30 am
Last week, we reported on the Bar Standards Board’s disbarring of barrister David Harris, who tweeted as @geeklawyer. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 1:58 pm
It echo's the recent dissent of Justice David Souter in Bowles v. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 10:39 pm
United States, No. 11-597 (cert. granted Apr. 2, 2012), the case in which the Federal Circuit held that flooding caused by the Corps of Engineers was only temporary, and did not result in a compensable taking merely because it eventually stopped, and "at most created tort liablity. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 7:29 am
UBS Securities LLC et al., case number 22-660, before the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 6:02 am
The AG's motion was granted based on the Court of Appeals' Adams ruling.Just prior to the beginning of her criminal trial, Likine's attorney moved for reconsideration of Judge McDonald's evidentiary ruling; this time arguing that precluding her from presenting evidence of her "ability to pay" and of her employment history, violated Likine's constitutional Due Process rights under the 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution. [read post]
25 May 2010, 11:26 pm
A public interest defence which could only be rebutted by proof of malice would not strike a fair balance (and, as the position in the United States shows, would not make reduce litigation or make it cheaper). [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 4:29 pm
” The focus of his speech was United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 5:06 am
United States: The state secrets privilege at the Supreme Court" http://j.mp/gjLPGB very intriguing ... [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 12:55 pm
The tracking happened before the Supreme Court issued its decision in United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 5:45 am
The AG's motion was granted based on the Court of Appeals' Adams ruling.Just prior to the beginning of her criminal trial, Likine's attorney moved for reconsideration of Judge McDonald's evidentiary ruling; this time arguing that precluding her from presenting evidence of her "ability to pay" and of her employment history, violated Likine's constitutional Due Process rights under the 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 10:05 pm
And finally, I've been wondering for a few weeks if John Oliver would weigh in on the Apple v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 6:17 am
Briefly: In the Los Angeles Times, David Savage reports that “[b]ecause of loopholes in tax laws and a weak enforcement policy at the Federal Election Commission,” Justice Kennedy’s prediction of transparency in Citizens United has not come to fruition in this election cycle. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 7:16 am
Testifying on behalf of the Judicial Conference of the United States, which makes policy for the federal courts (but does not speak for the Supreme Court), U.S. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 1:46 pm
In the case at hand, United States vs. [read post]
