Search for: "Washington v. People"
Results 5621 - 5640
of 6,229
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2009, 3:44 am
Constitutional Court of Korea Declares Korean Dictator’s Martial Law Decrees Unconstitutional Liquidated Damages v. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 5:46 pm
(Apparently, only one other state, Washington, similarly dispenses with a state-of-mind element for drug trafficking.) [read post]
19 Aug 2007, 6:04 pm
“This more or less legalizes the N.S.A. program,” said Kate Martin, director of the Center for National Security Studies in Washington, who has studied the new legislation. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
It is asking the Court to overturn the Supreme Court’s 1984 landmark decision in Chevron v. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 4:10 am
"Because of the recession, a lot of students are facing debt they can’t pay,” said Lamm, a partner at White & Case in Washington, D.C. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 8:04 am
On March 4, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in June Medical Services v. [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 6:15 am
In a recent post, Celeste Monforton, of George Washington University School of Public Health & Health Services, wrote about conflicts of interest and the recent Georgia-Pacific decision out of the First Department of the New York Appellate Division, Weitz & Luxenberg P.C. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 10:22 am
On this subject (and probably only this subject) we’re content to let the other side of the “v. [read post]
The Office of Legal Counsel Discloses Classified List of Opinions in Important Step for Transparency
21 Dec 2023, 9:02 am
The case that led to the production of these documents, Francis v. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 12:03 pm
Griggs v. [read post]
19 Dec 2024, 5:30 am
To that end, Gabriella highlighted the Washington Principles, which promote open information sharing, central registries, and the return of stolen works. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 7:29 am
New Mexico, South Dakota, and Washington state already know this. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 12:49 pm
When most people think of a First-to-File patent system, they would probably think it means exactly what it says (the first person to file the patent application has priority). [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 9:35 pm
The current system of justice for poor and middle-class people is broken. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 7:19 am
The Supreme Court’s 1963 decision in Brady v. [read post]
8 Sep 2007, 2:46 pm
None of that occurred in People v. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 5:05 pm
He also left no doubt of his conviction that the Montana ruling would be struck down, probably swiftly, by the Supreme Court in Washington. [read post]
29 Jan 2008, 4:00 pm
" Farrell v. [read post]
22 Dec 2021, 7:29 am
As explained by the Supreme Court in 1935 in Berger v. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 3:25 am
He is still serving on the federal appeals court judge in Washington. [read post]
