Search for: "Wells v. State"
Results 5621 - 5640
of 66,527
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2021, 5:01 am
An excerpt: When acting within its territorial boundaries and with respect to internal matters, an Indian Nation retains the sovereignty it enjoyed prior to the adoption of the United States Constitution except to the extent that its sovereignty has been abrogated or curtailed by Congress (see Montana v United States, 450 US 544, 564; United States v Kagama, 118 US 375, 381-382; Cayuga Nation v Campbell, 34 NY3d 282, 291, 293). [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 11:32 am
Ct. 1937 (2009), isn't drug/device), there are still quite a few well-reasoned and useful 2009 decisions for those of us on the right side (in more ways than one) of the "v. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 12:29 pm
(People v. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 9:18 am
n Monday, November 9, 2009, the United States Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in the much anticipated Bilski case, which could well decide once and for all whether business methods and software remain patentable in the United States. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 8:26 am
Stat. 766.118 lacks any rational relation to a state objective, and fails both the “smell test” (another quote from Justice Pariente in Estate of McCall) as well as the rational basis test. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 8:26 am
Stat. 766.118 lacks any rational relation to a state objective, and fails both the “smell test” (another quote from Justice Pariente in Estate of McCall) as well as the rational basis test. [read post]
30 Apr 2025, 4:00 am
" The two topics fit well together. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 10:54 am
One of the challenges faced by the defense trial team in United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 3:08 pm
State Farm Lloyds, 202 S.W.3d 744, 746 (Tex. 2006). [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 10:45 am
This also applied to attempted robbery.In the dissent, Fletcher argues that the state courts expanded the generic definition under State v. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 2:34 pm
As the Court of Appeals has stated, "suppression motions must be in writing, state the legal grounds of the motion and 'contain sworn allegations of fact,' made by defendant or 'another person' " (People v. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 7:00 am
Relying on the United States Supreme Court's ruling in Oncale v. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 10:38 am
Summary Ostensibly, BG Group PLC v. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 6:25 pm
" Novak v. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 10:08 am
See, e.g., State v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 5:08 am
Elections benefit greatly from clear rules laid out well in advance of Election Day.... [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 12:41 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2024, 12:26 pm
” Well, the grades for the 2022 California legislature are coming in from the courts, and guess what? [read post]
